Travel Tips and Trivia

Last Updated: January 23, 2024

10 Primary Advantages and Disadvantages of Water Transport

Want to discover the primary advantages and disadvantages of water transport? Click here for everything you could possibly want to know!

' src=

Danny Newman

advantagesanddisadvantagesofwatertransport-7497155

I hope you find value in this run down of the primary advantages and disadvantages of water transport!

Most travellers move around via land or air.

They go in cars, buses, trains, and planes, but it’s almost always over ground or through the skies!

And you can’t blame them…After all, both domains of transportation offer fast, convenient, and budget-friendly ways to get from A to B.

Yet anyone who sticks exclusively to them all but ignores a third option that rarely gets the attention it deserves:

While it isn’t always a perfect (or viable) choice for itinerant people, this dark horse of getting around boasts a host of advantages that other modes of transport simply don’t.

Want to learn all about them? Keep reading to discover 10 advantages and disadvantages of water transport.

The Advantages of Water Transport

Let’s start with the good stuff. Here are the primary advantages of water transport to know about and enjoy when you’re travelling.

1. It’s Peaceful and Relaxing

The first thing to know is that travelling by water is almost always a peaceful affair.

It varies by the specific mode of transport you’re taking, of course. But, in general, you’re in for a nice and relaxing time.

Think about kayaks or sailboats, for example. There’s no roaring aeroplane engines or highway road noise to worry about here! It’s just you and the elements.

You have the calming effects of water to enjoy too. I, for one, can’t help but feel more chilled out when I’m next to a body of water.

Whether I’m hanging out on a beach or catching a ferry somewhere, there’s something about it that relaxes the mind and soothes the soul.

2. It’s Fun, Novel, & Adventurous

As I said in the intro, travelling by water isn’t as common as other ways to get around. I mean, it’s called ‘hitting the road ’ and not ‘hitting the sea ’ for a reason, right?

Most people take the bus instead of the boat.

And that novelty-factor alone can make the entire process feel far more interesting and adventurous. Undimmed by the familiarity of cars and planes, you’re in for a far more exciting time.

Better still, the reality of travelling by water is often no less adventurous than the idea of it.

Whether you’re hitting the seven seas in a sailboat or exploring secret coves in a kayak, you’re doing something fundamentally more exhilarating than other modes of transport.

advantagesofwatertransport-6275642

Advantages of water transport

3. It’s Safe!

Films like Titanic, Captain Phillips, Adrift, and Deep Blue Sea don’t send the greatest message when it comes to safety at sea…

Thankfully, though, the reality of water transport’s very different:

It varies slightly by the exact way you’re getting around (jet skis will always be more dangerous than canal boats, for example!). Yet the likelihood of coming to harm when you travel by boat is minimal- especially when you compare it to something like road travel.

4. It’s Super Varied

Another reason that water transport stands out in my mind is for the variety on offer.

Think about it:

Jet skis, kayaks, paddleboards, ferries, canal boats, cruise boats, sailboats, mega-yachts (if you’re lucky), paddle boats, catamarans, rafts…There’s no shortage of ways to travel on water.

And all of them offer a distinctive and entertaining experience!

I know, the same could be said for going on land (with buses, trains, cars, bicycles, motorbikes, and more to choose from).

Combine that variety with the novelty and wow factor of travelling over water, though, and I reckon you’re onto a winner- especially when you’re a traveller on the hunt for new experiences.

5. It’s Better for the Environment

Ordinary cars and planes are bad news as far as the environment goes. They burn endless amounts of fossil fuels and release mind-boggling quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere.

Oh, and don’t forget the noise pollution (remember the peace and quiet of travelling by boat!).

Now, many types of boats aren’t what you’d call ‘great’ in the environmental either.

But- if only because of the relative lack of them compared to cars and planes- they’re surely a better option for the ecologically-minded traveller…Especially when you’re powered by the wind!

It means that you can get from A to B without having such a negative impact on the environment.

You Might Also Like These Posts About:

  • The Advantages & Disadvantages of Air Transport
  • The Advantages & Disadvantages of Travelling by Car

disadvantagesofwatertransport-3425398

Disadvantages of water transport

The Disadvantages of Water Transport

It isn’t all hunky-dory though! There are various disadvantages of water transport to consider too. Check out this next section to learn all about them:

1. It’s Slow

One particular pitfall of most water transport comes down to time.

Basically, if you’re in a hurry to get somewhere that’s a long way away, then you might want to look elsewhere!

It doesn’t matter whether you’re going by ferry, kayak or sailboat, you move at a snail’s pace versus planes (and even some trains).

As much as I like slow travel compared to racing from place to place, sometimes you need to be somewhere fast. And, in those instances, going by water mightn’t be the best bet.

2. It Can Be Expensive

Here’s another disadvantage of water transport that’s related to travelling longer distances:

Getting from A to B by boat can be far more expensive than other forms of transport (such as flying)! For one reason or another, travelling over water can often cost an arm and a leg compared to what you’d expect to pay by land or sky.

That’s bad news for budget travellers! When money’s tight, travelling over water can put serious pressure on your purse strings.

3. It (Sometimes) Makes You Seasick

There are some practical challenges to going by boat as well. One of the worst?

Seasickness.

It’s a thing. And it sucks.

Some people suffer worse than others, but anybody who spends time on the ocean can expect to experience it at some point. And, whether you feel a vague nausea or suffer uncontrollable vomiting, it’s never fun.

prosandconsofwatertransport-8199391

Pros and cons of water transport

4. Weather/Storms Can Cause Trouble

It’s true that travelling on water’s a safe form of transport- especially when you compare it to other options (such as going by car and motorbike).

However, there’s no denying that adverse weather conditions and rough seas can reap havoc on the experience.

You only have to do a quick Google search to see how devastating storms can be at sea!

Indeed, the power of the ocean can be a scary thing. Riptides can pull you out, waves can knock you about, and serious storms can rip huge vessels apart like rag dolls.

5. It Can Be Impractical

Last but not least, there’s a level of impracticality to water transport.

First and foremost, you need water for it to be an option, right!?

That means it just isn’t viable for landlocked travellers looking to get around. As much as you might want to avoid road or air travel, you’ve got no other choice if there’s no waterway in sight.

Add that to the slowness and expense involved and going by water can often feel infeasible. Budget travellers looking to go long distances with limited time are arguably better off looking to other forms of transport.

Remember these Advantages and Disadvantages of Water Transport

Water transport’s often overlooked by hurried travellers looking to get from A to B.

Accustomed to going by land and sky, travelling by water gets ignored until an occasion when it’s the only possible option.

Hopefully, the advantages of water transport in this post have revealed why that’s such a shame!

Aside from the odd downside, going by boat (whatever the type) is a novel and exciting way of getting around that offers a host of unique rewards. Be sure to consider the pros and cons of water transport the next time you’re wondering how to get to your chosen destination.

  • Destinations
  • World of Food
  • Travel tips
  • Adventure travel
  • Food & Drinks
  • History destinations
  • Interesting facts
  • Luxury travel
  • Party destinations
  • Popular destinations
  • Romantic travel
  • Summer destinations
  • Tourist attractions
  • Tourist destinations
  • Travel news
  • Unusual places
  • Winter destinations

Logo

Everything you need to know about your next destination. Best things from Alaska till Australia, from the Earth and around it.

Contact us: [email protected]

© Travel S Helper - World Travel Guide

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms And Conditions

Advertisement

The risks of ferry travel

By Mick Hamer

18 August 1990

New Scientist Default Image

THEN the Herald of Free Enterprise capsized off the Belgian port of Zeebrugge in 1987, killing 193 people, not many naval architects were surprised; the disaster realised their worst fears. Large roll-on roll-off (roro) ferries are uniquely vulnerable: they can capsize rapidly in the calmest water without any warning.

In April this year at a conference of naval architects in London, Patrick McLoughlin, Britain’s shipping minister, acknowledged publicly for the first time that higher standards of stability are needed for roro ferries. Kenneth Rawson, a senior naval architect, agreed: ‘We have held our breath for three years and no loss through flooding of another roro has occurred in European waters, although my word, we have come mighty close to it.’ Last August, the Earl of Granville struck rocks and was holed as it entered Cherbourg; four months later, a Panamanian-flagged ship ripped a 20-metre hole in the side of the Hamburg, which was bound for Harwich (‘Naval architects fear more disasters’, This Week, 5 May).

Three days after Rawson’s warning the luck run out. On 28 April, in calm seas off the coast of Sicily, the Espresso Trapani flipped over in less than 15 minutes. The roro ferry was carrying 34 passengers and a crew of 18; 15 people died. Investigators believe that the vessel made a sharp turn as it was approaching the Sicilian port of Trapani, and that a lorry loaded with marble slabs shifted, making the ship unstable.

It is a frighteningly familiar tale. Just a little water on the car deck – as shallow as 25 millimetres, heard the inquiry into the capsizing of the Herald…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

No commitment, cancel anytime*

Offer ends 2nd of July 2024.

*Cancel anytime within 14 days of payment to receive a refund on unserved issues.

Inclusive of applicable taxes (VAT)

Existing subscribers

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

DeepMind and Liverpool FC develop AI to advise on football tactics

Why supersonic, diamond-spewing volcanoes might be coming back to life.

Subscriber-only

Gene variants may protect against brain disease linked to cannibalism

First nations astronomers predicted eclipses without using writing, popular articles.

Trending New Scientist articles

A Broken Backpack

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Water Transport

by Melissa Giroux | Last updated Feb 25, 2023 | Travel Tips

It’s no secret that the world is increasingly becoming a more and more connected place.

It’s easier than ever to get from Point A to Point B – no matter where in the world you happen to be.

One of the popular modes of transportation is water transport, which has a number of advantages over other types of transport.

But like everything, water transport also has its own set of disadvantages.

In this guide, we’ll discuss the advantages and disadvantages of water transport so that you can decide if it’s the right mode of transportation for you.

ferry at sunset time

5 Advantages Of Traveling By Boat

Below, we’ll discuss the pros of traveling by boat.

1. Water Transport Is A Relatively Cheap Way To Travel Long Distances

One of the major advantages of water transport is that it’s relatively cheap to travel long distances by boat.

For example, in the Philippines, a ferry ride is much cheaper than a flight. Not to mention, it’s also a lot more scenic!

2. It’s A Very Efficient Way To Move A Car Or Luggage

Another advantage of water transport is that it’s a very efficient way to move cars or luggage from one place to another.

If you’re moving house or going on a long road trip, water transport can be a great option for getting your belongings from Point A to Point B.

That said, the transport chosen could have a limit on luggage, so make sure you check before you book your trip!

3. It’s A Fun Way To See The World

Water transport is also a great way to see the world. When you’re on a boat, you have a front-row seat to some of the most beautiful scenery on earth.

From sunsets over the ocean to towering cliffs and everything in between, there’s no better way to see the world than from the deck of a boat.

You can also access different destinations such as Alaska or Antarctica by water transport which are difficult to reach by road or air.

ferry on a lake close to the mountains

4. It’s A Great Way To Relax And Unwind

Another advantage of water transport is that it’s a great way to relax and unwind.

Whether you’re taking a leisurely cruise down a river or simply spending a day at the beach, there’s no better way to forget about your stresses and relax than by spending some time on the water.

That said, you won’t need to drive, stay in the same position for hours, or sit in traffic when you’re on a boat. So, if you’re looking for a relaxing way to travel, water transport is definitely the way to go.

5. Water Transport Is Relatively Environmentally Friendly

Lastly, water transport is relatively environmentally friendly. When compared to other modes of transportation, such as cars and planes, boats produce far fewer emissions.

So, if you’re looking for a way to travel that won’t have a negative impact on the environment, water transport is a great option.

5 Disadvantages Of Traveling By Boat

Now that we’ve looked at the advantages of traveling with water transport, let’s take a look at the disadvantages.

ferry deck

1. Water Transport Can Be Slower Than Other Methods

One of the major disadvantages of water transport is that it can be slower than other methods of transportation. For example, a cruise ship can take days or even weeks to reach its destination.

And while this can be seen as an advantage (after all, you have plenty of time to relax and enjoy the ride), it can also be a major downside if you’re in a hurry to get from Point A to Point B.

2. Water Transport Can Be Expensive

Another disadvantage of water transport is that it can be expensive. While boat travel is generally cheaper than air travel, it can still cost a pretty penny – especially if you’re taking a long-distance trip.

That said, the cost of water transport can vary depending on the type of transport you choose. For example, a ferry ride is typically cheaper than a cruise.

So, if you’re on a budget, be sure to do your research before booking your trip.

If you’re traveling by boat overnight, you may want to look into booking a cabin for a more comfortable experience, or sleep on the deck if you’re on a budget.

3. Water Transport Can Be Dangerous

While water transport is generally safe, it can be dangerous in certain situations. For example, if you’re taking a long-distance trip, there’s always the possibility of bad weather or rough seas.

Unfortunately, water transport can also be susceptible to accidents.

So, if you’re planning on taking a water transport trip, be sure to research the safety record of the company you’re booking with.

That said, it’s important to note that accidents don’t happen regularly. Overall, traveling by boat is safe.

4. Water Transport Can Be Uncomfortable

Another disadvantage of water transport is that it can be uncomfortable.

For example, if you’re taking a long-distance trip, you may be confined to the boat for hours or even days.

And, if you’re traveling on rough seas, you may experience motion sickness.

So, if you’re prone to motion sickness, be sure to take precautions before boarding your vessel.

5. Water Transport Can Be Unreliable

Finally, water transport can be unreliable. While boat travel is generally safe and reliable, there is always the possibility of delays or cancellations due to bad weather or other unforeseen circumstances.

So, if you’re planning on taking a water transport trip, be sure to allow for some flexibility in your schedule.

Final Thoughts On Traveling By Sea

Overall, water transport offers several advantages over other methods of transportation.

These include its environmental friendliness, affordability, and relaxing nature.

However, it can also be slower than other modes of transport, uncomfortable and dangerous.

So, before booking your next trip by sea, be sure to weigh the pros and cons carefully to see if it’s the right option for you.

Traveling by sea can be the right solution to visit islands, but also remote locations like fjords.

Water transport is an interesting way to move around the world, but it’s not without its disadvantages.

So be sure to consider all the pros and cons before booking your next trip by boat!

Not sure if traveling by sea is the right solution for you? Compare different transportation methods:

  • Advantages and disadvantages of traveling by car
  • Advantages and disadvantages of traveling by train
  • Advantages and disadvantages of air transport

disadvantages of ferry travel

MY TOP RECOMMENDATIONS

BOOK HOTEL ON BOOKING.COM

BOOK HOSTEL ON HOSTELWORLD

GET YOUR TRAVEL INSURANCE

LEARN HOW TO START A TRAVEL BLOG

LEARN HOW TO VOLUNTEER ABROAD

disadvantages of ferry travel

The Travel Done Simple Logo

  • Step-By-Step Guide
  • Google Flights Guide
  • Momondo Guide
  • Online Travel Agency Guide
  • Southwest Airlines Guide
  • Airline Seating Guide
  • Train Travel
  • Ferry Travel
  • Blablacar Guide
  • Poparide Guide
  • Hitchhiking
  • Car Rental Guide
  • Ride-Hailing Guide
  • Public Transport Guide
  • Booking Your Accommodation
  • Airbnb & Vrbo Guide
  • Hostel Guide
  • Couchsurfing Guide
  • Coronavirus Travel
  • Proof of Onward Travel
  • Dual Passport Travel
  • Travel Insurance
  • Advanced Travel Safety
  • Female Traveler Safety
  • Best Travel Debit Cards
  • Best Travel Credit Cards
  • Getting Cash
  • Travel-Ready Phones
  • Prepaid SIM Cards
  • Top Travel Apps
  • Packing Guide
  • Group Tours
  • North America
  • Southeast Asia
  • Central & South America
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • Australia & Oceania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • South & Central Asia
  • Cheapest Destinations
  • Split-Ticketing
  • One-Way Return Tickets
  • Hidden-City Ticketing
  • More Strategies
  • Budget Airline Guide
  • Cheap Transportation Guide
  • Cheap Accommodation Guide
  • Top Budget Travel Tips
  • Travel Blog

The Ultimate Guide To Traveling By Ferry

The ultimate guide to traveling by ferry by travel done simple

This page may contain affiliate links which means I get a small commission, at no extra cost to you, if you make a purchase with them. This helps keep the site running and the travel tips coming! For more info, check out my Privacy Policy & Disclosure .

When you travel to a destination that is located near bodies of water that you have to cross to get to your next destination, then you will most likely travel by ferry.  

Destinations like Thailand, Spain, and Greece are some of the first ones that come to mind when thinking about ferry travel, but the largest ferry system in the world can actually be found in Washington State, USA so ferry travel is more commonplace than you think and it’s good to know what to expect so that you’re prepared the next time you have to take one.  

On this page, I will tell you everything you need to know about traveling by ferry so that you will be well-prepared for when you have to book your ticket.  

I will focus on ferries that travel for larger distances and between main destinations and not the ones that simply cross a river/small channel or that are part of a city’s local transit system.  Those types of ferries can usually be treated like local buses with frequent departures and tickets bought on board or just before you board.

These are the top 7 things you need to know about traveling by long-distance ferry:

1. Your experience will vary depending on the operator and country

Ferries come in all shapes and sizes, some will only transport people while others will also transport vehicles.  Some might come with a pre-assigned seat, but most of the time you just take whichever seat you want once you’re on board.  

Regardless, you won’t be restricted to your seat in most ferries and they often also have an outer deck for you to check out if you wish.  You can expect a toilet on board for ferries that travel longer distances and some of them might even have a shop where you can buy food, snacks, or drinks.

In more developed countries, you can expect higher quality vessels with more amenities, but there are always differences between different operators.  It’s worth it to do a quick check for any online reviews to see what other travelers have said about a specific ferry operator or route.  

When it comes to changes or cancellations, it also depends on the operator, although most of the time your ticket will probably be non-refundable.

2. The larger the ferry, the smoother the ride, and vice versa

Ferries are not great if you get seasick easily, but on some of the larger ferries, the ride is so smooth that you won’t even notice you’re on a boat until you look outside.  But this goes the other way too.  If your ferry is a small one, be prepared for a potentially nausea-inducing ride.  

I have been on some ferries (like the one between Ibiza & Formentera in Spain) that were so bumpy that pretty much everyone on the boat was seasick.  But I’ve also been on other small ferries that were completely fine so it really just depends on the sea conditions at the time.

Sometimes you won’t get a choice in the size of the boat and you will have to deal with what you got if you want to get to your next destination.  

If that’s the case, the best tip I have is to get fresh air if possible and to keep your eyes on the horizon in front of the boat to help your body understand why it keeps rocking back and forth which is what causes seasickness in the first place.

3. There is no Google Ferries

Unlike Google Flights, there is no one website that exists that will let you see the schedules and book ferries for every country in the world.  Depending on the country and region, you will either have to go to the ferry operator’s website for that country to get that information or go to the local ferry port/terminal in person.

That being said, a good way to see what ferry operators there are for any route you’re looking for is to check Rome2Rio .  The best thing to do is to note down the ferry operators it finds for your route and then check out their specific websites to see schedules and pricing. 

In addition, there is an online travel agency (OTA) that I recommend for ferries and it’s called Direct Ferries .  It has the largest number of ferry partnerships amongst all OTAs and it’s worth searching for connections on their site too, although be aware that any booking you make will come with a service charge of around $5 so if you want to save that money, just go to the ferry operator’s website to book your ferry!

And if you can’t find any information about ferries on either of those two websites and there is no website for the local ferry operator, then you will have to ask at the local ferry port/terminal to get information about scheduling and prices.

4. Consider also checking for flights

While traveling by boat is the instinctive way to cross smaller bodies of water, sometimes flying actually makes more sense if the destination you’re going to also has an airport.  If you’re not traveling with a vehicle, then oftentimes, a flight can be cheaper and quicker than a ferry.  

For example, to get between Valencia and Ibiza in Spain, a ferry would take around 5 hours and cost around $50 whereas a flight with Ryanair can be as cheap as $15 and take less than an hour.  

However, if the island or destination you’re going to doesn’t have a nearby airport, then the ferry will be your only option.

5. Booking in advance isn't always necessary, but it is recommended

Most of the time, you can just buy your ticket for the ferry on the same day.  Ferry operators have fixed prices and don’t generally increase prices leading up to departure dates like airlines do so there’s no risk in waiting until the same day to buy your ticket.  

However, if it’s a popular route or it’s high season and there are a lot of other travelers, the ferry might sell out by the time you try to buy your ticket. 

In general, it is good practice to be prepared and make your bookings in advance whenever you can to avoid any potential issues.  

6. Check-in should be done at least 30 minutes before departure

There is no universal check-in time for ferries as they can vary by operator and service.  Sometimes your booking confirmation will give you a check-in time, but if you aren’t given one, I recommend showing up no later than 30 minutes before your ferry is scheduled to depart.  

Trains and buses can depart their respective stations in seconds, but ferries require more time than that to depart the terminal so you need to be on board at least 10 minutes before the scheduled departure.

If you plan to travel with a vehicle, then you might need to do your check-in even sooner as it takes time to load up the ferry with all the vehicles.  In this case, I recommend arriving no later than an hour early.

7. There is a way you can take some ferries for free

If you’re a budget traveler or you simply want to save money on ferry tickets, one way you can do it is by finding the lineup for the vehicles that are about to board the ferry and start asking drivers if you can hitch a ride in their car as it boards.  

If you’re not traveling with a big group, chances are that you will be able to find at least one driver nice enough to let you do this.  It does help to have a grasp of the local language as not everyone will be able to speak English in foreign countries.

However, this only works if the ferry charges people per vehicle and not per passenger if traveling by vehicle.  So by adding you to their car, the driver would not incur any extra cost and you would get to take the ferry for free!  

Some drivers may ask you to pay a small amount like $5 as a courtesy to them or maybe you buy them a treat from the ferry’s shop to say thank you, but that’s nothing compared to the cost of some ferry tickets!

That being said, if the ferry charges per passenger in a vehicle, then you’re better off buying your own passenger ticket.  Make sure to do your research beforehand and check how the ferry company you plan to travel with charges its passengers.  Give this a try the next time you have to take a ferry.

And that’s all you need to know about ferry travel!

Ferry travel is often an overlooked method of transportation, but it’s important to be prepared because in some cases, it may be the only method of transportation available to get you to where you want to go.  I hope this guide gave you a better understanding of what to expect.  If I missed anything, let me know in the comments below!

And if you’d like to learn more about a new, unique method of transportation that’s taking Europe and now North America by storm, check out my Guide to Ridesharing .

Sebastian, the travel expert and traveler who is also the creator of a travel website called Travel Done Simple

About The Author

Hi there,  I’m Sebastian , founder and creator of Travel Done Simple. Since I turned 20, I have lived in 5 different countries and traveled to over 40 others! You can learn more about me on my  About page   and find me on social media.

Hi there, I’m Sebastian , founder and creator of Travel Done Simple. Since I turned 20, I have lived in 5 different countries and traveled to over 40 others! You can learn more about me on my About page   and find me on social media.

guest

I’m Sebastian , the founder and creator of Travel Done Simple! I was born in Europe and raised in Canada, but I now consider myself to be a citizen of the world. When I’m not busy exploring new destinations, I’m here giving you the best travel tips so you can do the same! 

You can learn more about me on my About page and if it’s your first time on my site,  start here !

Find Whatever You Need

Latest travel blog posts.

disadvantages of ferry travel

The Best Balkan Trip Itinerary

Sebastian from Travel Done Simple sharing his experience in the Kootenays of BC Canada

Life in the Kootenays (BC, Canada)

Sebastian from Travel Done Simple with a camel in the Sahara Desert in Morocco

My Experience In Morocco Feat. That Time I Crashed A Moroccan Baby Shower

Like on facebook.

(And join the official group too!)

Follow on Instagram

Downwithsebster.

A lovely little escapade to the home of malbec and mountains

Home | About | Contact | Privacy Policy & Disclosure

© 2024 Travel Done Simple - All Rights Reserved

Basics: Where Can Ferries Succeed?

brisbane-river-city-ferry

Brisbane’s cross-river ferry

(Updated 2 May 2019)

Ferries are always an appealing transit idea. A serene way to travel when the weather is nice. Great views!  And they must be reliable, because they never get stuck in congestion!

As always, there’s more to it.  Ferries are sometimes the right answer, but the barriers they present often outweigh their benefits.  Where should they seriously be considered?

Think of a ferry as a rapid transit line, minus the huge cost of land and rails and power supply, but unable to continue across a land-water boundary.

Like rail, ferries carry the limitation that everyone has to get off at the end of the line.  Obviously you need transit connections there for onward journeys onto land, but the resulting passenger trips often require several changes of vehicle to continue in one direction, which is always less effective than services that can flow continuously across the city like a well-designed bus or rail line.  So if the same market is already served by land transit using bridges or tunnels, ferries often struggle to compete, because bus and rail services  can penetrate deeper into the city on both sides to complete logical networks.

Another constraint of ferries is that waterfront land is expensive, so it’s hard to find space at a ferry terminal for everything you’d want at a transit node, including terminals for connecting transit, transit-oriented development, and (if you must) commuter parking.

To overcome these limitations, a successful ferry line must have most or all the following necessary conditions.

  • High frequency.  Unless you have a huge rush-hour commute market, low frequency makes a service t0o narrowly specialized.  Frequency requires minimizing on-board labor, as labor drives operating cost and thus constrains frequency.  (Marine regulations in many countries are an obstacle to this.)  Ferries with only one employee on board achieve frequency through low labor costs.  See, for example, the privately owned  micro-ferries on Vancouver’s False Creek  (really a small, sheltered harbor) or the small cross-river ferries in Brisbane.  These can do well with only moderate demand because they are so cheap to operate, and can build up useful frequency for the same reason.
  • Very high density  right in walking distance of the ferry terminal, preferably without major grades to climb.  This is a challenge because if you draw a walk-access circle around a ferry terminal, most of it is usually water.  Cities that slope upward steeply from the water, like Seattle, present further barriers.  Using Park-and-Ride as the main method of ferry access almost never works, because waterfront land is too expensive for such an inefficient land use .
  • Quality landside access  by frequent connecting transit modes, sufficient to draw adequate all-day demand.  This and the previous one can substitute for each other to a degree, but the most successful services have both. In Hong Kong, for example, there are large bus terminals at the major ferry terminals, despite astronomical land value and the many competing demands, because they really understand the importance of total networks, which in turn are built on easy connections.
  • No competition from bridges or tunnels , especially those carrying frequent transit lines (rail or bus).  Ferries just can’t compete, for high volume, with bridge-and-tunnel services.  Sometimes ferries are run to densely populated coves where the competing bridge or tunnel lands too far back from the water to serve the area, as on New York’s East River, but in this case you have to fill the ferry solely with waterfront demand, because people inland will take the bridge or tunnel service.
  • A Direct Path .  Ferries along twisting rivers are often disappointing, unless the available land-based paths are equally indirect.
  • Few Major Terminals, Not Many Little Ones. A common mistake in ferry planning is to build too many little terminals, each with too small a market, so that they don’t support enough frequency to be useful.  Auckland and Sydney, for example, have lots of ferry terminals in bucolic suburban coves, down a steep hill from most nearby residents, where there are just not enough people.  These tend to become elite services and often not very productive ones. Fewer stops with larger demand is the key, just in the most productive land-based networks.
  • Favorable Pricing.   If there is any possible competition with bridge/tunnel service, the ferry needs to be cheaper to use, counting the total trip including any connections.  It’s often hard to justify that if there is more than one employee per vehicle.

The immensely successful Staten Island Ferry has all the necessary features, including huge transit networks converging on both ends.

The immensely successful Staten Island Ferry has all the necessary features, including huge transit networks converging on both ends.

Really successful ferries, like New York’s Staten Island Ferry or Hong Kong’s Star Ferry, have all of these features.  At a smaller scale, Brisbane’s cross river ferries and Vancouver’s False Creek ferries, both with just one employee per vehicle, scale well for short trips across a water barrier.

The romantic and scenic qualities of ferries always generate support, just as happens with rail services, but service must be useful, compared to your alternatives, if it is to succeed long-term.  Tourism and recreation are often cited as markets, but unless you have a supercharged tourism sector, and the right kind of service and connections, this market is easily overstated due to inevitable private sector boosterism.

As always, if the ridership prospects are low and the benefits are mostly private, the funding should be private as well.  Encourage the tourist sector to fund tourist ferries directly, just as you would for any service precision-designed around a single interest.  The same could be said for small, low-demand ferries that mostly benefit a single development or specialized community.

So yes, ferries are good at certain things, but destinations along the water, and some local enthusiasm, isn’t enough to ensure a successful ferry project.

Related Posts

  • Richmond: Bus Rapid Transit Line Approved
  • Include Bus Rapid Transit on Rapid Transit Maps?
  • new york: instant bus rapid transit

39 Responses to Basics: Where Can Ferries Succeed?

' src=

Vancouver SeaBus is my favorite example of a ferry that gets everything right: a corridor with no bridge or tunnel, frequency (every 15 min, 6 am to 8 pm, every half hour until after midnight), well designed transit connections on both ends, a lot of jobs within walking distance, and boats/docks designed for getting a lot of people on and off quickly. And 16,000 riders a day is pretty good. Unlike just about every other ferry I can think of, it feels like it was designed with transportation in mind, not nostalgia or the romance of the sea.

' src=

I was thinking of SeaBus, too. Many major ferries (Staten Island, SeaBus) have transit terminals at one or (in those cases, both) ends.

In the US the other ferries I can think of are in Seattle (no bridge competition) and Boston (competition is from very congested highways). There is some talk of a last-mile ferry from North Station in Boston to the Seaport district, but this would work just as well as a BRT if you could get a lane on Congress Street.

' src=

The SeaBus is very succesful, bus as Jarrett alluded to, it’s mostly people headed to the immediate walkshed of the north Vancouver ferry station. Competing bridges do exist a few miles east or west of the ferry route, and for destinations further inland (e.g. where the ferry option would require a bus connection on both ends), busing across the bridges is usually faster, at least when there’s not rush hour traffic.

' src=

Brisbane’s ferries are excellent because the water provides a dedicated transitway free of traffic. It also links together destinations along the river that aren’t accessible by bridges.

Brisbane’s CityCat ferries are generally not located in built-up areas (many terminals are located in park lands) and have very poor connection to trains and buses.

The Brisbane CityCat ferries however attract good patronage (ca 6 million passengers per year), however the three staff on board (captain, ticket seller and deckhand to open and close boarding gates) mean that it is more expensive than, say, bus transport.

Dwell times on ferries are a killer. Stopping a bus or a train is a simple thing, but ferries require the vehicle to dock, ramps to go down, gates to open, and then the whole thing needs to go into reverse for departure.

The most patronised day for Brisbane’s ferries are Sundays. The boats are full with tourists who want a cheap river tour.

Dwell time is one of the things that’s great about SeaBus. They have double ended boats with a single bridge that use their power to dock, a dock that cradles the boat, and automated, really wide, ramps. They claim a 3 minute turnaround time from arrival to departure. Halifax uses the same technology.

' src=

I don’t think London’s River Bus services meet the criteria as the river routes are largely parallel to tube routes… except the river is generally slower. For example, it takes about 10 minutes from Westminster to Canary Wharf on the Jubilee line tube but about 30 minutes on the river bus.

According to Transport for London, the river buses have over 10 million passengers a year although I don’t know the proportion of commuters and tourists.

Maybe a seat, a view and less congestion are more important than journey time, even for some commuters?

The London River Buses are integrated into the same Oyster card payment system used for tube, train and buses as well.

' src=

River Bus is also not frequent enough to be relevant in most cases, especially with parallel tube lines so close by.

' src=

As a Londoner, who used to use the Thames Clipper regularly (but not for the everyday commute) when I lived near the route, I would say that there are three factors: – “Amusement-ride with multiple exits” demand is huge in Central London – both from tourists and suburbanites (the main reason I used the Thames Clipper was for the homeward journey after a date). – Public transport in London is capacity-constrained, so anything which adds capacity will be used. – This ) – a lot of people need to commute by public transport, but find overcrowded tubes unbearable. For a lucky few of them, the Thames Clipper is a lifeline.

' src=

Increasing riverbus services in London has been such a constant “cool idea” that doesn’t work, ever since WWII, that proposing it has become an anti-shibboleth to recognise people who don’t really understand public transport in London. As well as slow travel, as Michael said above, and parallel E-W tube lines, as Jarrett said, the big issue is that jetties are far enough from other kinds of public transport to be inconvenient but not far enough to be worth specifically serving. Another big problem is the strong tide in the Thames in central London, which mean that journey times against the tide are significantly affected, and the variation in the water level makes jetties more complicated. “Cool idea” attempts to create riverbus services along the Lea in East London during the Olympics similarly flopped due to lack of connections with other transport methods and low capacity.

I appreciate that the London river buses shouldn’t work given the faster parallel tube lines but i was surprised that it has over 10 million passengers a year – I don’t think this is just from tourism. As Jonathan Monroe says, it looks like there are enough people,who are happy with a slower journey and a seat than be packed into a tube train.

As a comparison, the London River Bus ridership dwarves the East River ferry which has over a million passengers per year. The (free) Staten Island ferry has just over 20 million.

' src=

London has six River Bus routes, but only one is strictly cross-Thames. The rest travel along the River, stopping on both banks intermittently. There are also two rush hour express services ‎based on the longest routes, and a special events express route.

Frequency is every 20 minutes, and routes operate all day and evening, with lesser frequency evenings and weekends.

London River Services estimate that approximately half of the ridership are commuters and locals (occasional riders like Jonathan Monroe), and the other half tourists (as River Buses are significantly cheaper and faster than ‎River tours). Some routes are primarily for commuters, others mainly for tourists, and the rest cater to both.

The 10 million annual rides is comprised of about ‎40% River Buses, with the rest being the aforementioned river tours, Woolwich free ferry, and river charters & party/dinner boats.

Still, 4m rides a year is darn good considering the River Buses started only in 1999 with one boat.

The entire River Bus fleet, except for the ‎cross River ferry shuttle, are catamarans, which are powerful enough to deal with the Thames tides, as well as sufficiently maneuverable to quickly move around other River Buses and tourist boats.

Note that along the north bank of the Thames, there is no single Tube line that traverses the length of the River that the River Buses cover. Along the south bank, there is not a Tube line that runs parallel to the River.

The Lea River ferry run during the 2012 Olympics was run by a different company, who charged £60-80 one way between Olympic Park and the Thames. Massively overpriced, it lasted about two weeks.

There is an article which describes London’s Thames transport in more detail here: http://www.londonreconnections.com/2016/13841/ .

' src=

Although it doesn’t meet all criteria set by Jarrett, the Québec City-Lévis (population 700,000) ferry is pretty successful with 1.8 M passengers per year. Located 15 km east of the two bridges across the Saint Lawrence River, it’s operated with large vessels (571 passengers, 54 cars and 80 bicycles) and runs every 20 minutes during peak hours (30 minutes day/60 minutes at night until 2 am).

With a new intermodal terminal on the south shore, with direct connexion to buses and bike lanes, the ferry is a interesting option for residents since access to the ferry is free for monthly bus pass holders from either side. However, the ferry growth is constrained by geography. The steep cliffs on both sides require an effort from commuters to access the heart of the old city.

There is also of course the Funiculaire du Vieux-Québec http://www.funiculaire-quebec.com/en/PhotosFuniculaire.htm which is a short walk from the Lévis ferry. However the funicular fare of $2.50 each way is not integrated with the ferry nor with the bus system.

' src=

Geography is a critical consideration. If a ferry route is a short, straight line and the alternative is a long circuitous bus route (which is often the case in Sydney), then a ferry is a better option. And intermediate stops are not necessarily an issue so long as they are not cul de sac diversions and proper attention is given to the design of the landing/ vessel interface to speed up passenger loading. Unfortunately, loading speed is not given enough attention at Sydney Australia, unlike the Vancouver SeaBus which has superb turnarounds. For all its faults, the Sydney Ferry network carries over 15 million passengers per year, with a higher cost recovery rate than either buses or trains.

' src=

The F3 Parramatta River service has pretty good dwell times, everything is relatively quick on this service, maybe because it’s the most “normal” route on the ferry network and is expected to perform like a train or bus or maybe the waters are calmer on the river making it easier to rendezvous. The other routes are generally nothing but a glorified shuttle service.

' src=

Some thought food: 1. In my city there is a bus which goes by ferry! (to Priwall peninsula). Both ferry and bus are run by the same public transport company. Cars have to pay for the ferry. 2. To get there you might’ve used the tunnel Herrentunnel for which both cars and busses have to pay. For bikes and pedestrians there’s a “shuttle bus” with stops at both ends of the tunnel – free of charge. 3. In Hamburg there is at least one ferry stop where only staff of a specific company may get on and off, although the ferry line itself is open to the public and can be used with a day pass for the tube. Never heard of a tube or bus station like this…

' src=

Another interesting example of a ferry that gets it right is the ferry across the harbor from Dar Es Salaam to Kigamboni. It has a huge minibus terminal on one end, a new BRT terminal on the other, 15 minute frequencies, and no bridge competition. The beautiful views of downtown Dar are a bonus(especially at sunset!). No idea what the ridership is, but it’s surely quite high.

I edited the post to add a note about pricing to the bullet list (h/t Cap’n Transit), on 28 Dec.

There is enough benefit to ferries, at least in the U.S – so long as the ferries carry cars, they become eligible for highway funds, which are much more numerous than transit funds, and not available for ferries that carry only passengers.

In the Seattle area, there are lots of rural areas to the west of the city that are connected by car ferries. While these ferries do require huge taxpayer subsidies to operate, they have highway money, rather than transit money, to pay for it. Yet, people can and do ride these ferries without cars, so they still serve a transit function (in fact, the passenger capacity is, by necessity, much higher than the car capacity, so during high demand times, walking on the ferry can save hours of waiting in line with one’s car).

Sometimes, as a thought experiment, I pretend that these communities were connected to Seattle by a car bridge, and imagine what kind of transit service would run across the bridge. Considering the nature of the communities on the other side, and that neither county would be enthusiastic about paying to run their buses in the other county (or across the miles of water in between, with no passenger stops), the result would probably be rush-hour service only, in one direction only. Instead, we have bi-directional ferry service, running 20 hours a day, seven days a week, paid for with highway funds, rather than transit funds. So, for transit, it’s definitely a good deal.

' src=

For Seattle area ferries, it’s important to keep in mind that many of these communities have no other reasonable alternative. For Bremerton-Seattle, for example, the go-around route is 60 minutes thru the worst traffic Seattle has to offer. The Mukilteo-Clinton go-around is about two hours. Go-around from Port Townsend to Coupeville will take all day (5 hours). And, of course, Vashon and San Juans are impossible to get to any other way.

The Washington State Ferry network is better thought of as a safety net service – it’s there because these communities desperately need it.

' src=

Makes me think about the failure of Vogueo in Paris. It was a boat line that was on the river Seine.

_with only average frequency, compared to the subway _with average density, being on the side of the town, not in the center _with OK access(probably the lone of the 5 points filled) _with huge tunnel & bridge opposition, for both cars, buses, subways, suburban trains _costlier than a subway ticket

And the green were absolutely scandalized when it was closed. It was just used by a few tourists, losing a massive amount of money, but still, they shouted it was the “future”. Errrm, no. When a service fills no need, it’s not needed(by definition).

Since you mention the Seine, this also brings up an important note about river ferries. Transit needs to be direct to someplace. There is not way to follow the Seine in Paris and be a direct route to anywhere. The route of the Seine is inseine.

' src=

I think there are two types of ferries: Firstly, there’s the short & frequent shuttle-type that fills the gap where you’d expect a bridge or tunnel. In Amsterdam the free ‘foot & bike ferries’ are good examples, as well as the Staten Island ferry and many more. Secondly, there are longer routes with multiple stops, acting as water buses. In Rotterdam such a line operates to Dordrecht, using the Dutch river system. The service is frequent, quick and cheap, and delivers its passengers directly in the city centre. It has a bunch of intermediate stops and bikes are taken at no charge, solving the problem of limited access to the hinterland. It connects to some trams and buses, and even other ferries. This has made this link competative with cars and train services.

Venice – of course – has bus-like services, the vaporettoes, which offer good connections within Venice and with Ludo and the Mainland. At Ludo, you don’;t even have to cross the street to change from ferry to bus, and one of those bus routes (# 11) takes a car ferry to another island, in order to get you to another vaporetto… However, Venice isn’t a perfect fairytale. The airport is served by a separate, more expensive system, and the route to Fusina is expensive, slow, infrequent, and has no intermediate stops. Its end station is quite random. And there are no vaporetto services to Mestre. So even the water capital of the world can improve quite a bit!

1. Shuttle ferries: short, frequent, no intermediate stops, filling missing links

2. Water bus: long, with intermediate stops, acting as a bus route, useful when waterways are quicker than roads.

*Ludo = Lido.

' src=

Waterbuses between Rotterdam en Dordrecht are not an alternative for landtransport. As a citizen of Dordrecht and working in Rotterdam (both within bicycle range of the Waterbus steps) I never take the bus but use train& metro. Reason: travelling by Waterbus & bike will take my commute over an hour, while by train and metro it willl only take 30 minutes (and also frequencies favour rail). The speed of Waterbus on the river is so low that even commutes between Krimpen and Leuvehaven (first two ferry points) is almost as fast as a detour over land using bus & metro, but being 4x less frequent. Even the Waterbus between Leuvehaven en Heijplaat is from the city center almost as fast as the detour by bus & metro, but has less connections southwards, is far less frequent too and not running in the evening.

Waterbus is a very popular system, especially by bycicle users and tourists, and because of very well done marketing. The views, I admit, are great, the staff very friendly and the journey over water is pleasant. But as a transit mode for commuting, it is only a niche market, because the speed of watertransport is too low. Passenger use of Waterbus boats is only fractional of that by parallel rail and busses.

On the Amsterdam-IJmuiden canal Fast Ferry did manage to get better travel times as landtransport. Here the hydrofoil boats proved to be expensive in use, difficult in heavy water traffic and finally passenger demand from IJmuiden appeared to little for keeping the Fast Ferry afloat in the end.

' src=

The multitude of ferries from the mainland to the islands west of Seattle are quite successful, and largely because there isn’t really another option — nobody’s going to build bridges or tunnels that long to all the islands. That’s perhaps the most archetypal use case for ferries.

But then there’s Hawaii, where everyone flies in pollution-belching, CO2-belching planes between the islands! Insanity! Surely fast ferry systems should work in Hawaii?

' src=

There have been a few attempts at starting ferry service in Hawaii but all have failed. Residents of other islands were afraid of Oahu’s homeless population migrating to other islands and cars/traffic from Oahu. There were also concerns about pollution from the ferry.

http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/Aug/27/ln/hawaii708270351.html

Oh my god. NIMBYism and bigotry at its worst. So basically the other islands are drawing up moats to keep the riff-raff from Oahu out. Yuck.

Concerns about “pollution” from the ferry are a joke; the airplanes pollute far more.

' src=

I have to say that I think Hong Kong is unique as far as ferries go, specifically the Star Ferry. It competes with 3 highway tunnels and 2 (I think it’s 3 now) subway lines. The reasons why it is still successful in my opinion is a combination of: price (at around 2 hkd it has to be one of, if not the, cheapest ferry service in the world), low-stress (it is much less stressful to ride the ferry than sit in traffic on a bus or navigate a crowded subway station), above-ground scenery (not to mention riding through one of the busiest harbors in the world, always interesting), nostalgia (these boats are around 100 years old I think) and, last but definitely not least, the extremely high density of the Hong Kong built environment which generates such high demand that any moderately useful transportation service will be patronized (you could open a row boat service and people will ride it – okay maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but you get my point… although I did ride a ferry in Hong Kong that was just a wooden boat propelled by a long wooden pole, it was in the New Territories. I would post a picture of it if I could.).

Regarding demand – I think demand is so high in Hong Kong that you can hardly call it a competing service. It is more of a complementary service as it can take pressure off of the overcrowded subway and road network.

' src=

The ships now are half a century old. The service itself existed for almost as long as Hong Kong opened up.

The complementary and supplementary role ferries play in Hong Kong is being increasingly neglected. Lines aside from Star Ferry are left alone and almost fending for themselves. Star Ferry itself is getting pushed back after reclamation. While that might give it an edge on accessing waterfront destination the loss of accessibility is noticeable and lamenting. The new Wan Chai pier remotely located from the center of the area got hit pretty hard. Can’t imagine how much ridership would fall after the Shatin-Central Link opens (cross-harbor buses too) with the Exhitbition station right next to it. Central – Tsim Sha Tsui is unique and care-free for us.

There’s another nostalgia on a Tuen Mun – Tsim Sha Tsui / Central high speed ferry route (closed due to cost) away from the pressure of traffic and accidents on the Tuen Mun highway and jam-packed sardines on West Rail. The almost-conspiracy of a “rail-based transit system” means the solution to everything is build a railway and that’s it. There’s no sense of an inter-modal system and cooperation between competing services. Bus lines get slashed randomly (still much room of improvement on bus operators and the route alignment). Expensive new connecting minibus lines to transfer at a station.

Which brings us to the new South Island Line. Riders on the yet to be constructed western section are literally forced to transfer or take that worsened bus service. Fortunately there’s this minutes long journey on a boat across to the island where lies the end of the Line, making the their lives at transfer slightly easier. Not sure on the immediate results and ridership change but people will take it. Coverage should be decent enough without official endorsement of this option the ferry will survive.

' src=

I just visited Hong Kong for the first time, and I think the ferries are in deep trouble. The Star Ferry Central pier was moved 500m away to give space for a road. I imagine a typical commuter arrived on a bus to Tsim Sha Tsui or Hung Hom, hopped on the ferry to Central and then walked to work. I also used the Hung Hom to North Point Ferry The ferry is not frequent, and the bus terminal has lots of spare capacity. It been many years since I was in Bangkok, but the Chao Praya River Express solved the dwell time problem. Need two crew for that too work though. Gothenburg has a cross river line. I don’t know how well that works, but it seems to me that the boats are too big and too infrequent. Stockholm has boats that are used by commuters from Nacka and some other places. Ferries could make it easy for people to bring bikes onboard. 2-3km to the ferry, 1 km from the ferry to work is a viable commute. But I don’t know any that allows you to ride your bike onboard, stand next to it during the ride, and then ride off.

' src=

One funny thing, ferries in Rio de Janeiro metro area- which includes Niteroi, São Gonçalo and the whole Guanabara bay- have limited speed because of their closeness to an industrial and freight port around Galeão.

So you have ferries doing a 20km trip in a very slow speed in what is basically a daily commuting movement from a residential area (Niterói) to a commercial and professional district (Rio downtown). This, added to the lacked of connections with metros and buses, lack of coverage of the transport by not going to places like Copacabana, Barra or Botafogo even though they are important coastal spots with hospitals, universities, residencies and offices, makes the ferry extremely unprofitable.

' src=

If you remove item number 4 (No competition from bridges or tunnels) then you could say the same thing about a subway (metro) line. In other words, all of these are major factors in determining the success of a major investment in transit. I would say that item number could actually be altered to be more general. How about “No competition from other forms of transit or transportation”. Thus a subway line that parallels an uncongested freeway will be less successful than one that goes under a major barrier.

To me this doesn’t speak to the main advantages and disadvantages of ferries. I would say the following about the big boats:

1) They can carry huge numbers of people per trip. The same can be said for a train, of course, but you can’t say that about a bus or a gondola.

2) Dwell times and headways are large. I don’t think there is any ferry system that operates like a good subway system (with two minute headways and short dwell times), let alone a BRT system or gondola line, where headways and dwell times are measured in the seconds.

3) They are relatively slow from stop to stop. There are exceptions of course, but generally speaking a ferry travels much slower than a train or a bus (although much faster than a gondola).

Given all that, I think ferries have their place in various situations. Obviously they are very successful when geography works in their favor — when the alternative is a very long trip around. When that isn’t the case, they can still be popular in classic urban transit situations (lots of people and congestion). In many cases, they remind me of commuter trains. Not really appropriate for the middle of the day (a bus would make more sense) but there is plenty of demand (and congestion) during rush hour to justify their use.

What makes them different than a subway (and more like a commuter train) is that stops along the way are usually a negative. An inner city subway may make ten stops before it gets to downtown, but typically there are large numbers of people getting on and off at those stops. In other words, a large percentage of the ridership is between stops. With commuter rail it is the opposite — almost everyone is headed to or from downtown. With the really big dwell times, it rarely makes sense to build a ferry system like that. Almost everyone is simply going from one stop to the next (or at least would like to).

Taking bikes on a ferry increases the catchment area for the ferry a lot. Another option is getting buslines to or on a ferry. Question is: Should a bus service go on a ferry or should it terminate at the ferry ports at both ends?

In Texel, Netherlands an experiment with a bus service using the ferry was ended due to poor punctuality, because of influence by the sea (high tide). Crossing passengers now have to change from bus to boat and back. Which means that crossing times can be long due to poor connections or high (bus) frequencies must be run.

In Norway some buslines use the ferries and ferrytimes are planned for good bus crossing, but in the fjords sea and wheater influence may be much lower.

Are there any more examples of buslines using ferries and what is the influence of using a boat on punctuality of the bus?

' src=

I’ve seen pictures of a King County Metro (Seattle) bus on a ferry. I would think that the lack of having to transfer would be desirable, but it would mean the bus and operator really wouldn’t be productive while parked on the ferry.

More confusion 😉 1. There is a “ferry” in German which is a “bridge” in English (see “Rendsburg High Bridge” on wikipedia). 2. Once upon a time, between the then villages Genin and Moisling there was a “ferry that was only moving when it wasn’t running”. The ferry was as long as the river was wide. People paid for it and then crossed like on a bridge. When a boat on the river approached, the ferry was turned by 90°.

Oops! Canal, not river!

' src=

Not sure if this has already been mentioned in one of the many comments above, but another way a ferry can compete with say a bus service using adjacent bridges/tunnels, is its predictability and speed. In Bergen, Norway, people I know from municipalities north of the city (Askøy and Meland) commute by ferry because the bus is stuck in traffic on the bridge (which is a two-lane bridge so no possibility of a lane dedicated to public transport for the foreseeable future). The ferry might be less frequent, but at least you know you’re going to make it to work on time. The county is looking into possibilities of increasing frequency as ferry is becoming increasingly popular.

I agree. As Jarrett has often pointed out, reliability is often as, and sometimes more, important as speed. Do Bergen’s ferries require all passengers have seats? I can’t recall the situation on Vancouver’s SeaBuses between downtown and North Van(couver), standees may be allowed. London’s River Buses operate under Maritime legislation that requires a seat for each passenger. Which restricts rush hour surges, but allows a more comfortable ride.

  • Case Studies

A sustainable travel dilemma…

  • by Jamie O'Hare

Here at SI, our mission is to make the world a better place, one project at a time. And whilst our main sustainability impact is the positive impact we have through our projects, we endeavour to practice what we preach in terms of reducing the environmental impacts of our operations, including our business travel. In this blog, we share some surprising lessons learnt while trying to minimise our travel carbon footprint. With suprising stastics regarding if we should take the ferry or to fly?

With COP27 in full swing this week, global leaders and policymakers have been taking their private jets to Sharm el-Sheikh whilst a few dedicated souls elected to sail or cycle . The contrast of approaches once again stirred the debate about the carbon impact of business travel , particularly when the purpose of the travel is to discuss reducing greenhouse gas emissions!

This is a debate that I often have with myself. Having married a ‘Derry Girl’, I’ve had the pleasure of living in Northern Ireland for the last 11 years. Whilst living in the northwest of Ireland provides many benefits, including an abundance of stunning beaches and coastline, hearty cuisine, and good craic with the locals, it is not the most convenient location to be based when it comes to travelling to the rest of the UK, or internationally, for conferences and client workshops.

The ‘new normal’ ways of working mean that much of our work can now be completed through online meetings and workshops. But when business travel is necessary, I have a big dilemma.  Should I take the ferry or fly? I often try to use the ferry as I find it offers a very comfortable and relaxed way to travel and it offers a much lower carbon footprint compared to flying…or so I thought!

Later this month, I will be delivering a TRIZ training workshop for a client in the south of England. In this case, the ferry option would involve the Stena Line Belfast – Liverpool ferry plus a five-hour train journey. The flying option would involve a direct Aer Lingus flight from Belfast City airport. Because of the ferry timings, the ferry plus train option would require an additional night away from home (although with three young children, that can be a blessing – just don’t tell my wife I said that!). It was also significantly more expensive. “Still”, I thought, “the ferry is justifiable in terms of the carbon savings”. To reassure myself of this fact, I decided to do a quick comparison of the carbon footprint of my two options.

For both options, the first part of my journey would be by bus but, as the port and airport are a similar distance from my house, we can ignore that leg of the journey.

Option 1 – Ferry and train

Stena Line does not currently have their own carbon footprint calculator for passenger journeys and so the website directs customers to Travel & Climate .

The journey from Belfast Port to Birkenhead is approximately 260km. Putting this into the calculator gives an estimated carbon footprint of 59 kg CO 2 e.

For the train section of my journey, thetrainline.com provided an estimated carbon footprint of 13 kg CO 2 e.

So, the total for the ferry and train option was 72 kg CO 2 e .

Option 2 – Flight

Aer Lingus does not provide carbon footprint estimates during the booking process. They do have a partnership with Pure Leapfrog, which allows you to offset the carbon emissions of your Aer Lingus flight. This offsetting tool estimated the emissions of my flight to be 70 kg CO 2 e.

I double checked this by putting the estimated flight distance in the Travel & Climate calculator and got an estimate 71 kg CO 2 e.

The journey from the airport to the city centre will be short and by train so the impact of this part of the journey will be negligible.

So, the total for the flight option is 70 kg CO 2 e .

Shock, horror! The ferry is actually slightly worse than flying!? “This can’t be right!” I told myself, so I decided to do dig a bit deeper.

Calculating carbon emissions for a journey simply requires knowing the distance travelled and the ‘emissions factor’ for that mode of transport. The distance is easy enough to estimate using the measuring tool in Google Maps . If there was to be some surprise element it was likely to be related emissions factors.

I went back to Travel & Climate calculator to check the emissions factors they were using for passenger ferry travel. Conveniently, they have published their emissions factors on the website , so I quickly found that they use an emissions factor of 226 grams of CO 2 e/passenger-km for ferry travel.

I then looked up other reputable sources of emissions factors for passenger ferry travel. Laroche et al. [1] report an emissions factor of 19 grams of CO 2 e/passenger-km. More than a factor of 10 lower than the value used by the Travel & Climate calculator. Grythe and Lopez-Aparicio [2] report an estimate of 95 grams of CO 2 e/passenger-km – still less than half of the Travel & Climate value.

At this point, I was feeling happy that the ferry emissions from my journey might be lower than I had initially calculated, but very confused as to why there was such variation in the emissions factors for passenger ferry travel.

I decided to contact the Stena Line sustainability team in the hope that they could provide some clarity. I summarised my findings in an email and asked if they could comment on the emissions factor I should use for the Belfast-Liverpool route.

To their great credit, I received a detailed response from Stena Line within a few days. They explained that the variation in emissions factors is often linked to some key methodological choices. In their own calculations, Stena Line apply the EU Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) methodology . This requires that the emissions of a vessel be allocated between the passengers and goods transported based on the area occupied . This results in more of the emissions being allocated to the passengers than if the emissions were allocated based on revenue or weight . They also provided the latest emissions factors for the Stena Edda and Embla ferries, which serve the Belfast-Liverpool route (and are published on the EU THETIS platform ).

  • Jan-Mar 2022:            492 g CO 2 /passenger-km
  • Apr-Jun 2022:             336 g CO 2 /passenger-km
  • July-Sep 2022:            264 g CO 2 /passenger-km

N.B. These figures do not account for non-CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions and so are reported as ‘CO 2 ’ and not ‘CO 2 equivalent’.

According to Stena Line, the variation across the year is due to the worse weather conditions and lower utilization of passenger capacity in the winter months, and vice-versa.

Interpolating from these figures, my ferry journey in November might have an emissions factor of around 400 g CO 2 /passenger-km. This would give a Belfast-Liverpool journey carbon footprint of:

260 km x 0.4 kg CO 2 /passenger-km = 104 kg CO 2

With the train leg adding a further 13 kg CO 2 , the ferry and train option, appears to be 46 kg CO 2 (65%) worse than the flight option.

For balance, I checked some other sources for estimates of the flight emissions, resulting in the following estimates:

  • 70 kg CO 2 e – Pure Leapfrog
  • 71 kg CO 2 e – Travel & Climate
  • 130 kg CO 2 e – World Land Trust
  • 149 kg CO 2 e – MyClimate
  • 152 kg CO 2 e – Clevel

There is still some significant variation in these estimates but less than the factor 10 variation I found in the ferry emissions estimates.

If we take the average value of the flight carbon emissions estimates, 114 kg CO 2 e, and compare that with the ferry plus train option, 117 kg CO 2 , we find they are very similar.

So, after all that digging what can we conclude from this exercise?

  • “Show me the numbers!” This was always the response from a certain professor at the University of Bath to any assertion about something being ‘more sustainable’. In this case, the numbers have proved me wrong in my assumption that the carbon footprint of ferry travel is significantly lower than flying. When in doubt, check the numbers.
  • We need to give travellers easier access to carbon footprint data . Most travel sites still do not present carbon footprint data to the user, and I often had to manually calculate distances and input them into a 3 rd party carbon calculator to get an estimate. Thumbs up to thetrainline.com for integrating this information into the booking process (see below). Stena Line has also confirmed that they are planning to offer travel customers a carbon footprint calculation in their booking system.

disadvantages of ferry travel

Carbon footprint calculation from thetrainline.com.

  • We need better standardisation of carbon footprinting methodologies. The factor 10 variation in emissions factor for passenger ferry travel was puzzling but could be explained to some extent by the differences in allocation methodologies. From a consumer perspective, if they encounter such wildly different estimates of carbon footprint from one source to another, the likelihood is that they will become confused, frustrated, and lose trust in the data. If governments, NGOs, and industry want consumers to make carbon-literate choices, they need to ensure that consumers have access to consistent, high-quality carbon footprint data. Hopefully, standardisation activities, such as ISO 14083 , will help in this challenging endeavour.

So, should I fly or take the ferry? I still have many questions about the accuracy of the carbon footprint estimates I’ve come across and the consequences of my choices. Do the estimates account for effective radiative forcing ? Will taking the ferry regularly support more sustainable innovation in the ferry industry, such as carbon negative marine biofuels ? Should I take the ferry in the Summer but not the Winter? Could I absolve my soul of carbon guilt by purchasing carbon offsets? Etc. I guess, the unending questions and existential angst are just part of the joy of being a sustainable innovation consultant! Please let me know your thoughts on my dilemma in the comments.

[1] Laroche et al. (2023). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517722001431

[2] Grythe and Lopez-Aparicio (2021). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666765721000752

Jamie O'Hare

  • Jamie O'Hare https://strategic-innovation.co.uk/author/jamie-ohare/ Reuse and refill – is the packaging industry ready to make the leap?
  • Jamie O'Hare https://strategic-innovation.co.uk/author/jamie-ohare/ Moves towards sustainability for food and beverage packaging
  • Jamie O'Hare https://strategic-innovation.co.uk/author/jamie-ohare/ A day to remember for sustainable ocean management
  • Jamie O'Hare https://strategic-innovation.co.uk/author/jamie-ohare/ Strategic Innovation for Sustainability: Five Lessons I've Learnt
  • International edition
  • Australia edition
  • Europe edition

Ferries on the way to Calais

Is it OK to travel by ferry?

Ferry companies have done much to clean up their act in terms of waste disposal and engine pollution, and the sheer numbers of passengers on a conventional cross-channel ferry mean that emissions per person will be low, and as many piggy back on freight services your actual carbon footprint is likely to be minimal. A standard car ferry emits just 10kg of CO2 per foot passenger for a return trip Dover-Calais. High-speed ferries, such as the catamarans that travel out to the Channel Islands, use engines with a much higher carbon count, but compared with short-haul flying even they are likely to come up greener as their emissions aren't at high altitude where CO2 exerts a greater effect on the environment. You can now offset emissions for most UK ferry routes via a new online ferry booking service, ferrygreen.com .

· To ask questions or offer advice, go to greentraveller.co.uk .

  • Green travel

Most viewed

The place of ferries in the sustainable transport debate

The place of ferries in the sustainable transport debate

How green are ferries compared with transport alternatives? Three Northern Europe-based operators share their sustainability strategies with Michele Witthaus

By Michele Witthaus | 16 October 2017

What would you consider to be the most significant contributions your company has made to sustainable passenger transport in recent years?

Erik Lewenhaupt, head of sustainability at Stena Group: Stena Line has the ambition to become a leader in sustainable shipping, both when it comes to our ships and to our ports operations. Apart from safety, which is priority number one, we work continuously to minimise our carbon footprint in terms of air and water emissions, and to improve waste handling and support responsible consumption onboard. Our significant contributions to sustainable shipping include our methanol engine conversion project, our upcoming battery trial, shoreside electricity investments, phasing out the use of plastic disposables and using closed loop scrubbers.

Veiko Haavapuu, finance director at Tallink Grupp: When the stricter Emission Control Areas (ECAs) regulation came into effect in January 2015, Tallink Grupp made a strategic decision to start using more environmentally friendly, but more expensive, low-sulphur marine gas oil and at the same time to invest in vessel monitoring systems to achieve more efficient vessel operations. Other alternatives would have been to continue to use high-sulphur content heavy fuel oil and to invest in scrubbers, which we did not consider to be a sustainable long-term solution. When we saw the first results of using the vessel monitoring systems, we decided to continue to expand the programme. Just by operating the vessels more intelligently using more data from operations, we have gained 4-9% fuel efficiency per vessel in our fleet.

In January 2017, Tallink Grupp introduced a new dual-fuel shuttle vessel, Megastar, on the busy Tallinn-Helsinki route between Estonia and Finland. The environmentally friendly ship uses LNG as main fuel and she will comply with the new and stricter emission regulations for the ECA areas, including the Baltic Sea. Using natural gas as fuel reduces noise and exhaust-gas emissions. Dual-fuel engines in gas mode produce 25% less carbon dioxide, 85% less nitrogen oxide and practically zero sulphur oxide and particles emissions, compared to traditional diesel or heavy fuel burning engines.

Nigel Wonnacott, head of communications at Brittany Ferries: In the past three years, we have invested a90 million (US$106 million) to retrofit exhaust emission-reducing scrubbers to six cruise ferries. This was an important interim step for the company in improving the sustainability of its fleet, with benefits of significant sulphur and particulate reduction. We have also announced plans for the first LNG-powered ship to operate on the English Channel. To be named Honfleur, this ship will be delivered in 2019. This is an important statement of our confidence in the future, but also our drive to protect the environments in which we operate.

How do your ferries fit alongside the other transportation and travel options in the regions where you operate, and what trends do you see in this context?

Lewenhaupt: Northern Europe is likely the busiest region in the world when it comes to ferries due to the geography and ease of travel/trade in the European Union. On the travel side, we have seen an increasing competition from low-cost airlines for a number of years, while the freight works more as a complement to road/rail transportation and develops with trade. Our business is roughly a 50/50 split between travel and freight so we rely on returning and happy customers in both segments to be successful.

Haavapuu: Tallink Grupp’s routes connect the largest cities in the North Baltic Sea region and this makes sea transportation a crucial part of local economies and trade in the area. In 2016, all Tallink Grupp’s routes showed both growth in passenger numbers and cargo transportation volume. Around 8.7 million passengers travelled between Tallinn and Helsinki by ferries and planes in 2016, of which the vast majority (8.5 million passengers) used sea transportation.

Wonnacott: We are the only operator on the Western Channel and we are therefore a popular choice for travellers seeking the best of regions like Normandy and Brittany in France, and the north coast of Spain. Transport links continue to improve, most recently the significant enhancement of high-speed train services linking Paris to Rennes in Brittany. We have also renewed the charter for Pelican, our freight-only service linking Poole and Bilbao, Spain. Demand for this route continues to be strong and we hope to see more growth from operators in the next 12 months.

What are the key environmental sustainability challenges you face going forward and what are you doing to address them?

Lewenhaupt: Without doubt, the biggest impact is ships’ propulsion. To find the next fuel that will cut the industry’s dependence on oil is the main challenge, both for the planet and for the industry to stay competitive. We believe the future will consist of several different solutions depending on the size, trade and age of ships – we expect battery-powered and hybrid vessels for short sea routes and methanol, LNG or renewable fuels for deep sea. We are testing a couple of new energy sources – methanol and batteries – in live operation.

Haavapuu: The Baltic Sea area where we operate has a unique marine ecosystem and it is our priority to have environmentally sound operations to preserve the environment for future generations. The decisions and actions we have taken are showing the direction towards more environmentally friendly and sustainable sea transportation, making Tallink Grupp a pioneer in this area.

Wonnacott: With the launch of Honfleur we are addressing a familiar transport problem: we want to implement cleaner fuel for our ships, but the local refuelling infrastructure does not yet exist. Of course, maybe in the future, we’ll see LNG storage in ports but we cannot wait for this. So, we’ve developed an innovative solution and a world first for our new ship. LNG containers will be delivered to Ouistreham in Normandy by truck, then driven on to the ship in port. From there, an onboard crane will hoist them into a fixed position aft of the superstructure, where they will feed an LNG master tank. The process will take place in reverse when the tanks are empty. This solution is a really important first step – maybe a giant leap – for us and the ferry sector as a whole in terms of large-scale introduction of LNG vessels.

Which do you regard as a more important driver of sustainable ferry operations – regulation or innovation – and why?

Lewenhaupt: Carrot or stick? Sadly, up until now, regulation is usually what has driven innovation, but let’s hope that changes.

Haavapuu: We believe the increasing awareness of the impact of human activities on the environment raises the bar for all means of transportation – including sea transportation – and that also drives innovation.

Wonnacott: Regulation has its place of course. But the issue we have is that localised regulation can ‘gold plate’ measures that are already defined on the international stage. That’s a very difficult position for shipping as a whole. The real driver of innovation in sustainability comes from a genuine will to do more to protect the environments in which a business operates. We remain a company that’s committed to the land and the sea – we are still owned by the collective of French farmers who launched the company 44 years ago. For us, sustainable development is not a business imperative, nor a corporate social responsibility goal, it’s what we are all about.

Tags: Stena Line     Brittany Ferries     emission control areas

Michele Witthaus

Michele Witthaus

Related articles.

  • Stena Line’s newly refurbished ships return to North Sea
  • Stena Vision makes inaugural voyage on Rosslare-Cherbourg route
  • Wärtsilä to carry out methanol conversions on Stena Line ferries
  • Stena Line to continue running its Birkenhead-Belfast route until 2100
  • UK ferry industry to introduce 11 new hybrid-powered vessels by 2027

disadvantages of ferry travel

Contact author

Recommended.

APT Travel Group charters two Seabourn expedition ships for 2025

APT Travel Group charters two Seabourn expedition ships for 2025

Fred. Olsen Cruise Lines becomes first cruise line to depart from Newcastle in 2024

Fred. Olsen Cruise Lines becomes first cruise line to depart from Newcastle in 2024

Ponant becomes first cruise line to achieve Green Globe certification

Ponant becomes first cruise line to achieve Green Globe certification

Registration opens for CSI Design Expo Americas 2024

Registration opens for CSI Design Expo Americas 2024

Celebrity Infinity hosts promotional event in Port of Thessaloniki

Celebrity Infinity hosts promotional event in Port of Thessaloniki

Seatrade Cruise Global announces panellists for 2024 State of the Global Cruise Industry keynote

Seatrade Cruise Global announces panellists for 2024 State of the Global Cruise Industry keynote

MSC Cruises resumes operations from mainland China

MSC Cruises resumes operations from mainland China

CLIA commissions study to chart future of decarbonisation

CLIA commissions study to chart future of decarbonisation

The most popular stories of the month delivered to your inbox

  • About Cruise & Ferry
  • Newsletters
  • Our partners
  • ©2024 Tudor Rose. All Rights Reserved. Cruise & Ferry is published by Tudor Rose.
  • About Tudor Rose
  • Privacy notice and cookie statement
  • Terms of Use

Encyclopedia

  • Scholarly Community Encyclopedia
  • Log in/Sign up

disadvantages of ferry travel

Video Upload Options

  • MDPI and ACS Style
  • Chicago Style

Throughout the history of human development, sea transport has been widely exploited for the movement of passengers and cargo in many nations, especially in archipelagic countries. The sea passenger transport has gradually diminished over the past two decades, in part because of rapid developments in aviation and road transport, passengers continue to use cruises or ferries as the main means of transport for different purposes.

1. Introduction

2. an overview of ferry transportation in taiwan.

Jmse 10 00700 g001

3. The Risk Factors of Navigation Safety

3.1. crew factor (cf), 3.2. ship hardware (sh), 3.3. ship management (sm), 3.4. company management (cm), 4. risk matrix.

Jmse 10 00700 g002

  • Della, R.H.; Lirn, T.C.; Shang, K.C. The study of safety behavior in ferry transport. Saf. Sci. 2020, 131, 104912.
  • Todd, D. The World Shipbuilding Industry, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1985.
  • BCC NEWS.Congo River: At Least 60 Drowned after Boat Capsizes. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56082260 (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  • NORTHEST NOW. Bangladesh Ferry Capsize Toll Rises to 34. Available online: https://nenow.in/neighbour/bangladesh-ferry-capsize-toll-rises-to-34.html (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  • Wikipedia. Sinking of MV Sewol 2022. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_MV_Sewol (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  • Ung, S. Navigation Risk estimation using a modified Bayesian Network modeling-a case study in Taiwan. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 213, 107777.
  • Mia, M.J.; Uddin, M.I.; Awal, Z.I.; Abdullah, A. An era of inland water transport accidents and casualties: The case of a low-income country. J. Int. Marit. 2021, 5, 32–39.
  • Lau, Y.Y.; Lu, C.S.; Weng, H.K. The effects of safety delivery and safety awareness on passenger behaviour in the ferry context. Marit. Policy Manag. 2021, 48, 46–60.
  • Lu, C.S.; Tseng, P.-H. Identifying crucial safety assessment criteria for passenger ferry services. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 1462–1471.
  • Hsu, W.K.; Huang, S.H.S.; Tseng, W.J. Evaluating the risk of operational safety for dangerous goods in airfreights–A revised risk matrix based on fuzzy AHP. Transp. Res. D. Transp. Environ. 2016, 48, 235–247.
  • National Development Council. Taiwan Statistical Data Book; damit Erscheinen Eingestellt: Taipei, Taiwan, 2019.
  • Safer EURORO Report, Design for Safety: An Integrated approach to Safe European RoRo Ferry Design 2008. Available online: http://research.dnv.com/skj/safereuroro/safer_euroro_1_final.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  • Hsu, W.K. Ports’ service attributes for ship navigation safety. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 244–252.
  • Khan, B.; Khan, F.; Veitch, B.; Yang, M. An operational risk analysis tool to analyze marine transportation in Arctic waters. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2018, 169, 485–502.
  • Zhang, M.; Zhang, D.; Yao, H.; Zhang, K. A probabilistic model of human error assessment for autonomous cargo ships focusing on human–autonomy collaboration. Saf. Sci. 2020, 130, 104838.
  • Kececi, T.; Arslan, O. SHARE technique: A novel approach to root cause analysis of ship accidents. Saf. Sci. 2017, 96, 1–21.
  • Mutmainnah, W.; Bowo, L.; Sulistiyono, A.; Furusho, M. Causative chaindifference for each type of accidents in Japanese Maritime Traffic Systems (MTS). Mar. Navig.—Proc. Int. Conf. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2017, 11, 489–494.
  • Bowo, L.P.; Furusho, M. Human error assessment and reduction technique for marine accident analysis: The case of ship grounding. Trans. Navig. 2018, 3, 1–7.
  • de Osés, F.X.M.; Ventikos, N.P. A Critical Assessment of Human Element Regarding Maritime Safety: Issue, Planning, and Practice. 2003. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33421049_A_Critical_Assessment_of_Human_Element_Regarding_Maritime_Safety (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  • Dhillon, B.S. Transportation Systems Reliability and Safety, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019.
  • Mutmainnah, W.; Furusho, M. 4M Overturned Pyramid (MOP) Model Utilization: Case Studies on Collision in Indonesian and Japanese Maritime Traffic Systems (MTS). Mar. Navig.—Proc. Int. Conf. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2016, 10, 257–264.
  • Havold, J.I. Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2010, 95, 511–519.
  • Hsu, W.K.; Lian, S.J.; Huang, S.H. Risk assessment of operational safety for oil tankers-a revised risk matrix. J. Navig. 2017, 70, 775–788.
  • Hsu, W.K.; Huang, S.H.; Yeh, R.F. An assessment model of safety factors for product tankers in coastal shipping. Saf. Sci. 2015, 76, 74–81.
  • Kontovas, C.A.; Psaraftis, H.N. Formal safety assessment: A critical review. Mar. Technol. SNAME News 2009, 46, 45–59.
  • Hsu, W.K.; Huang, S.H.; Wu, S.W. A 3D continuous risk matrix for risk assessment of operational safety in inland container terminals. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2022, 236, 315–325.
  • Hsu, W.K.; Kao, J.C. The safety of ship berthing operations at port dock—A gap assessment model based on fuzzy AHP. Int. J. Marit. Eng. 2017, 159, A377–A392.

encyclopedia

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advisory Board

disadvantages of ferry travel

Rapid Travel Group

The Benefits of Travelling by Ferry

Travelling by ferry: the benefits

Travelling by ferry has a number of benefits, making it in many cases a better choice than taking a plane or train. Here are some of the reasons you might consider taking a ferry on your next business trip:

Man’s Best Friend

Many ferries are pet friendly (although often requesting that they stay in the vehicle or cabin) and it’s a much less distressing way for the pet to travel than the baggage hold of a plane. It also means not having to buy a travel cage for your dog, which can cost a lot more than a car harness. Brittany Ferries also have pet exercise areas onboard their pet friendly ships. Remember to bring a lead and muzzle for your dog as they will be required to wear them outside of your cabin/car.

Brittany Ferries pet friendly ships: https://www.brittany-ferries.co.uk/information/pet-travel/onboard-kennels-and-pet-friendly-cabins

Some tips for travelling with pets: https://www.rapidtravelgroup.com/2021/10/07/5-tips-for-travelling-with-pets/

Dog on-board a boat

A Bed for the Night in a Ferry Cabin

Some ferries for longer journeys offer their passengers a bed for the night – a service not offered on even the longest commercial flights, unless you count a reclined chair in first class. While some trains do have beds, they are usually trains intended for holidays on the actual train, rather than getting from A to B.

Room for vehicles on a Ferry

Since you can take your work vehicle or car with you, you can avoid a hire vehicle cost when you get there. Depending on the ferry company and the journey (luggage restrictions vary), you’ll also be able to take more luggage. Not having to carry your bags everywhere also means that you can bring all of your tools (as long as they fit in your car).

Vehicles on-board a Ferry

Your Health is better on a Ferry

Ferries provide a unique experience, where you can move around freely while you travel. The fresh sea air can also be good for your health, as well as a lower risk of developing conditions from lack of movement, which are a much higher risk on a plane. The ability to move around freely also means that you will have a more enjoyable time onboard.

The Food On-board

Some would argue that the food on-board is the best reason to take a ferry. With the benefit of having a proper kitchen, ferries usually have better quality and a better choice of food to choose from than a plane or train. Any shops on board may also have snacks!

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Start your journey

We would love to discuss your challenges and how we can help improve your booking process.

UK Local Rate: 0330 090 4142 [email protected]

disadvantages of ferry travel

Through the Blue

FALL IN LOVE WITH GREECE. AEGEAN ADVENTURES FOR FAMILIES.

Top tips for ferry travel in greece with kids.

Seajets docked at Piraeus Port

Last updated: 16 Jan 2023

Most islands in Greece don’t have airports, leaving you with the hairy task of navigating the Greek ferry system. Possibly daunting for foreigners in light of local peculiarities, with a bit of practice, ferries can be an appealing way to travel. What are they main considerations for families and how do you ensure the smoothest possible ride?

TYPES OF FERRIES

Not all ferries are made the same, so choose your vessel wisely. The large, high-speed ferries and catamarans (e.g. Golden Star SuperExpress, Hellenic Seaways Highspeed 6 and 7, Seajet WorldChampion Jet and Champion Jet1) are typically the only options we take. If you are seasick-inclined, remember that the larger the ferry, the more stable on the seas . Some ferries also have sleeping cabins for overnight travel to far- flung islands. Avoid the small and bumpy Flying Dolphin hydrofoils wherever possible. You can always check on the specific features of the ferry you plan to book by searching its name (as provided by your booking engine) out online.

Fast ferry travel in Greece

While ferry travel times are longer than flights, there are some advantages to large high-speed ferries , especially for families. 

ADVANTAGES OF FERRY TRAVEL

  • Comfort, space and amenities – More spacious than an airplane, if you’re travelling with kids, you can even bring your stroller on board larger ships for them to stretch out and sleep on. There’s ample space to walk around, and sometimes, a kids’ area (e.g. with a small screen playing cartoons, or even a tiny playground if you’re lucky). Hydrofoils aside, we’ve never been in a vessel without a cafe selling sandwiches, pies, and refreshment. Cafe-style seating around a table is also a feature of some vessels (e.g. Golden Star SuperExpress or Hellenic Seaways Highspeed 4 to the Cyclades). Restrooms have bad days, but are usually acceptably maintained.  Most are also equipped with baby changing tables in a separate family restroom. For added comfort, upgrade to Business Class. The actual experiential difference between class types differs from boat to boat, so you may want to wait to board the boat before deciding. There’s usually the option to upgrade onboard if space is available.
  • Timing – With ferries, it’s safe to arrive at the port 30-40 minutes ahead of your departure time. Keep in mind you might need another 15 minutes to navigate Pireaus in its largeness. So considering you don’t have to deal with the tedium of check-ins, boarding procedures, waiting for baggage, and other formalities which set a one hour flight back by another two hours, ferries start to make sense if your journey is not too long (3 hours or so), and you’re weighing it against plane travel.
  • Car transport – If you are planning to island hop, some high-speed ferries carry cars onboard (and all your baggage in it). We have a car in Greece so this makes sense for us, but if you’re renting one in Athens, you could also take this from island to island. A spot for your car is at added cost, and they fill up quickly, so you need to book ahead for this. And while this may sound like a brilliant idea, be warned that maneuvering and parking your car in ferries can be a very tricky thing you have to do with speed. Also, check your insurance policy coverage to be certain of any limitations for domestic travel. All that said, it might just be easier to rent a car at your new destination.

DISADVANTAGES OF FERRY TRAVEL

  • Unlike flights, ferries are subject to cancellations and delays due to high winds. A pretty serious inconvenience, especially if you’ve been left stranded on an island without an airport.
  • Port-side waiting areas are near non-existent, and uncomfortable . Hardly any seating and/or shade is available, so if you’re not in a car, you will have to drag your luggage around and stand in the scorching sun for a good 30 minutes as you wait for your boat. Otherwise, you simply sit in your car once you’ve parked it in the queue.
  • Boarding procedures are also chaotic , with hundreds (and their luggage) being funneled into the entryway to board at the same time.
  • Many of the ferries depart from Athens very early in the morning at about 7 a.m. – not a fun time by which to get the whole family in order.

Athens Piraeus Port Passenger Waiting Area

HOW TO BOOK YOUR BOAT

Ferryhopper has the most user-friendly online booking platform we have seen. Prices on all search engine databases we have used are the same or insignificantly different. On a recent booking, it even included an early bird refundable discount advertised on the main shipper’s website.

disadvantages of ferry travel

  • Consider Rafina port as an alternative to Pireaus (available for some destinations). It’s much easier to navigate being smaller, less chaotic, and probably fewer crowds to jostle with. A third port in Athens at Lavrion is also an option.
  • When you arrive at the port, it’s not always clear where to go. If you’re departing from Pireaus, look up the appropriate gate for your boat in advance so you know where you’re heading to. In the event of any confusion, ask port police for guidance . They are usually visibly around (dressed in dark blue uniform) and available to guide vehicular traffic.

Pireaus port ferry gate

  • Ferries (like planes) are not always on time. For real-time location updates, check the status of your ferry on an app like Marine Traffic .
  • If you’re not taking a vehicle, pack light. You will have to haul your luggage around considerably, stairs included. Luggage may be left on the racks found on both sides of the car deck as you board. These are stowed here on an at-your-own-risk basis.
  • If you’re taking your vehicle, be prepared to drive on and off the boat quickly to avoid holding up traffic. It’s a mad rush so the boat is able to depart on time. Also be prepared to leave the rest of the passengers to board the boat separately (they will walk up with the rest of the passengers) while the driver parks the car. When parking the car, staff will be on deck to guide you where to park (have your windows down so you can tell them which island you are destined for). This is important to be able to exit on the right island!

Boarding the ferry boat in Greece

  • If you’re bringing your stroller on board a large ferry, be prepared to carry this up and down a flight of stairs or two. Some larger ferries will have escalators.
  • When boarding the ferry, have your e-tickets or tickets (you will be given the option to select your preference) ready for boat staff to scan. It is likely to state that you will need your ID with you, but we have never been asked to show this.
  • Your seats may or may not be automatically assigned (some ferries have free seating). If they are automatically assigned, check-in early so the system seats your family together.
  • Have a light cardigan in hand. It can get cold inside.
  • Port (and other transport) strikes happen on occasion. Keep updated on the newsfeed of official media like Ekathimerini for news updates in Greece.

' src=

Milos with Kids: A Guide to Its Playground of Dreamy Adventures

Naxos: the greek island made for families, you may also like, looking for the best family holiday home in....

  • Driving in Greece

How to Plan a Sweat-Free Summer in Greece...

With love, from greece., staying safe – things to know before you..., what to feed kids in greece, ready for greece where to first, best times to visit greece.

  • City Stopover
  • Kalavrita (Winter Option)
  • Koufonisia ♡
  • Mykonos (Popular)
  • Santorini (Popular)
  • Saronic Islands
  • Northeast Aegean Islands
  • Athens – The Aeolian
  • Meet MAMAKITA
  • Papa’s Grove’s Greece
  • Where to First?
  • How to Select a Greek Island
  • Best Times to Visit
  • Ferry Travel
  • Trip Planning Tips for Young Families
  • Looking for Accommodation? Avoid these Mistakes
  • Staying Safe – Know Before You Go
  • What to Feed Kids In Greece
  • Summer Packing List
  • Travel Gear for Babies and Toddlers
  • Travel Toys for Toddlers
  • Beach Essentials for Families
  • The Ultimate Kids Beach Holiday Adventure Kit
  • Gifts from Greece

Hydrofoiling logo

Support our hydrofoil educational content for free when you purchase through links on our site. Learn more

[2023] Hydrofoil Passenger Ferry: The Future of Fast and Efficient Travel

Review Team

  • July 22, 2023
  • Hydrofoil Innovations

hydrofoil passenger ferry Hydrofoiling

Are you tired of long and tedious ferry rides? Do you dream of a faster and more exhilarating way to travel across bodies of water? Look no further than the hydrofoil passenger ferry! In this article, we'll dive deep into the world of hydrofoil technology and explore why these futuristic vessels are revolutionizing the way we travel. Get ready to be amazed by the speed, efficiency, and overall awesomeness of hydrofoil passenger ferries!

Table of Contents

Quick answer, quick tips and facts, what is a hydrofoil passenger ferry, how does a hydrofoil passenger ferry work, advantages of hydrofoil passenger ferries, disadvantages of hydrofoil passenger ferries, what is the difference between a hydrofoil and a ferry, why don't more boats use hydrofoil, what are the disadvantages of a hydrofoil, useful links, reference links.

A hydrofoil passenger ferry is a high-speed vessel that uses hydrofoil technology to lift its hull out of the water, reducing drag and allowing it to glide at high speeds. With their sleek design and advanced engineering, hydrofoil passenger ferries are the future of fast and efficient travel across bodies of water. Check out the latest hydrofoil passenger ferries on Amazon !

  • Hydrofoil passenger ferries can reach speeds of up to 50 knots, making them significantly faster than traditional ferries.
  • The hydrofoil technology used in these ferries allows them to glide above the water, resulting in a smoother and more comfortable ride.
  • Hydrofoil passenger ferries are more fuel-efficient than conventional ferries, reducing their environmental impact.
  • These vessels are equipped with state-of-the-art stabilization systems, ensuring a stable ride even in rough waters.
  • Hydrofoil passenger ferries are gaining popularity worldwide, with many countries investing in this innovative mode of transportation.

A hydrofoil passenger ferry is a type of vessel that utilizes hydrofoil technology to achieve high speeds and improved stability. Unlike traditional ferries that rely solely on their hulls to navigate through the water, hydrofoil passenger ferries have wings, called foils, attached to the bottom of their hulls. These foils generate lift as the vessel gains speed, allowing the ferry to rise out of the water and glide on the surface.

The hydrodynamic design of these foils reduces drag, enabling hydrofoil passenger ferries to reach remarkable speeds while consuming less fuel compared to conventional ferries. This makes them an efficient and environmentally friendly alternative for both short and long-distance travel.

Hydrofoil passenger ferries work on the principle of hydrodynamics. As the vessel gains speed, the foils underneath the hull create lift, similar to the way an airplane's wings generate lift. This lift elevates the hull out of the water, reducing drag and allowing the ferry to achieve higher speeds.

The foils are carefully designed to optimize lift and stability. They are typically shaped like inverted airplane wings and are made from lightweight materials such as carbon fiber or aluminum. The angle of attack and the shape of the foils are crucial in determining the performance of the hydrofoil passenger ferry.

To control the vessel's pitch and roll, hydrofoil passenger ferries are equipped with advanced stabilization systems. These systems use sensors and computer-controlled actuators to adjust the position of the foils, ensuring a smooth and stable ride even in rough waters.

Hydrofoil passenger ferries offer numerous advantages over traditional ferries. Let's take a look at some of the key benefits:

Speed : Hydrofoil passenger ferries can reach speeds of up to 50 knots, making them significantly faster than conventional ferries. This means shorter travel times and more time to enjoy your destination.

Efficiency : The hydrofoil technology used in these ferries reduces drag, resulting in improved fuel efficiency. This not only saves costs for ferry operators but also reduces the environmental impact of marine transportation.

Comfort : Due to their hydrodynamic design, hydrofoil passenger ferries provide a smoother and more comfortable ride compared to traditional ferries. The vessels glide above the water, minimizing the effects of waves and choppy seas.

Stability : Hydrofoil passenger ferries are equipped with advanced stabilization systems that ensure a stable ride, even in rough waters. This makes them a safer and more enjoyable mode of transportation.

Versatility : Hydrofoil passenger ferries can operate in a wide range of conditions, including shallow waters where traditional ferries cannot navigate. This opens up new possibilities for connecting islands and coastal areas.

While hydrofoil passenger ferries offer many advantages, it's important to consider their limitations as well. Here are some potential drawbacks:

Cost : Hydrofoil passenger ferries are generally more expensive to build and maintain compared to traditional ferries. The advanced technology and specialized design contribute to higher upfront and operating costs.

Weather Dependency : Hydrofoil passenger ferries are more sensitive to weather conditions compared to conventional ferries. Strong winds and rough seas can impact their performance and may result in service disruptions.

Limited Capacity : Hydrofoil passenger ferries typically have a smaller passenger capacity compared to larger conventional ferries. This may result in more frequent trips or limited availability during peak travel seasons.

Infrastructure Requirements : Hydrofoil passenger ferries require specialized infrastructure, such as dedicated docking facilities and maintenance areas. Implementing these facilities may involve additional costs and logistical challenges.

Despite these limitations, the benefits of hydrofoil passenger ferries make them an attractive option for efficient and fast travel across bodies of water.

Tourists on a cruise in Istanbul.

The main difference between a hydrofoil and a ferry lies in their design and mode of operation. While both vessels transport passengers across bodies of water, a hydrofoil uses hydrofoil technology to lift its hull out of the water and glide on the surface. This allows hydrofoils to achieve higher speeds and provides a smoother ride compared to traditional ferries.

There are several reasons why hydrofoil technology is not more widely used in the maritime industry. Some of the main factors include:

Cost : Hydrofoil technology is more expensive to implement compared to traditional boat designs. The specialized engineering and materials required contribute to higher upfront and operating costs.

Infrastructure : Hydrofoil vessels require specific infrastructure, including dedicated docking facilities and maintenance areas. The lack of suitable infrastructure in many locations limits the widespread adoption of hydrofoil technology.

Operational Challenges : Hydrofoil vessels are more sensitive to weather conditions and require skilled operators to ensure safe and efficient operation. These operational challenges can be a barrier to widespread adoption.

While hydrofoil passenger ferries offer many advantages, there are a few disadvantages to consider:

Cost : Hydrofoil passenger ferries are generally more expensive to build and maintain compared to traditional ferries.

Weather Dependency : Hydrofoil passenger ferries are more sensitive to weather conditions compared to conventional ferries.

Limited Capacity : Hydrofoil passenger ferries typically have a smaller passenger capacity compared to larger conventional ferries.

Infrastructure Requirements : Hydrofoil passenger ferries require specialized infrastructure, such as dedicated docking facilities and maintenance areas.

Hydrofoil passenger ferries are the future of fast and efficient travel across bodies of water. With their impressive speed, fuel efficiency, and comfortable ride, these vessels are revolutionizing the way we travel. While they may have some limitations, the benefits they offer make them an attractive option for both commuters and tourists. So, hop on board a hydrofoil passenger ferry and experience the thrill of gliding above the water at high speeds!

The Unsplash group took the ferry from Sausalito to San Francisco’s lovely Ferry Building. Although quick this trip offered incredible views of the city, water, and sunset.

  • Shop hydrofoil passenger ferries on Amazon
  • Browse hydrofoil-related products on Etsy

Car on ferry deck. Bird’s perspective.

  • Hydrofoiling.org
  • Wikipedia – Hydrofoil
  • Marine Insight – Hydrofoil Technology
  • Boat Design Net – Hydrofoil
  • Boat International – Hydrofoils: The Future of Yachting?

Review Team

Review Team

The Popular Brands Review Team is a collective of seasoned professionals boasting an extensive and varied portfolio in the field of product evaluation. Composed of experts with specialties across a myriad of industries, the team’s collective experience spans across numerous decades, allowing them a unique depth and breadth of understanding when it comes to reviewing different brands and products.

Leaders in their respective fields, the team's expertise ranges from technology and electronics to fashion, luxury goods, outdoor and sports equipment, and even food and beverages. Their years of dedication and acute understanding of their sectors have given them an uncanny ability to discern the most subtle nuances of product design, functionality, and overall quality.

Related Posts

disadvantages of ferry travel

Glide Above the Waves: The Ultimate Guide to Hydrofoil Surfboards [2024]

  • December 6, 2023

disadvantages of ferry travel

Hydrofoil Surfing Unveiled: 10 Reasons It’s the Future of Wave Riding [2023]

  • November 30, 2023

[2023] Hydrofoil Speed Boat: The Future of High-Speed Water Travel

  • November 6, 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Add Comment  *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Comment

Trending now

  • Pros and cons of ferries in comparison with other modes of transport

One of the most important types of transport for passenger and cargo transportation is a ferry. This watercraft cannot be called new: rather, it belongs to the traditional.

Thanks to ferry flights, it is possible to cross water spaces quickly and without obstacles, and then continue the route overland by private transport. The history of operation of ferries is very rich and demonstrates the reliability of these vessels on difficult and difficult routes.

The importance of ferries for passenger and cargo transportation

The water space has practically no borders. Thanks to the sea connection, the population of different countries can exchange the most important goods and cargo, as well as easily overcome huge distances. Waterways provide communication between distant states and islands, which is of particular importance for the world economy. It is often possible to transport certain goods only by ferry.

Many rivers are so full-flowing that the construction of bridges for communication is virtually impossible for various reasons. Thanks to ferry flights, stable communication is provided, comfortable transport interchanges are created.

Next, we will take a detailed look at the key advantages and disadvantages of ferry transportation. This will help you decide on the right transport for travel or cargo delivery.

5b1s79zk3ww8k0kg0owcws08g.jpg

About the advantages of ferries

The strongest side of this type of transport in front of planes, trains and buses is the highest level of comfort combined with affordable prices. At the same time, it is important to remember that traveling by ferry requires a lot of time, which may not be relevant in some cases.

Moving by ferry cannot be called a full-fledged alternative to air travel. It can take a very long time to overcome water routes, which makes ferry flights the most suitable for tourists. For strictly business trips, it is better to look at faster ways of moving.

At the same time, ferry flights have an important advantage over all others: a passenger can load personal transport on this vessel. Of course, this service is provided for an additional fee. Last but not least, the ferry crossing is ideal for passengers suffering from aerophobia.

Let's make a brief comparison of the ferry with the boat:

Popular articles

Sea voyage across the Mediterranean with Grimaldi Lines.

  • Ferries have greater stability on the water and do not cause rolling.
  • When traveling by ferry, you can walk freely on the decks, which is especially important on long trips.
  • The ferry provides individual cabins with windows and comfortable beds.

About the disadvantages of ferries

There are no perfect swimming facilities, and ferries also have their weaknesses. The main disadvantage of ferries, travelers often call the monotony of the landscape. During the entire journey from the deck, you can only observe the endless expanse of water. By the way, some travelers find a special charm in this and enjoy the tranquility during the trip.

Another significant disadvantage of ferry flights is their duration. Sometimes it takes an incredibly long time to move from the point of departure to the destination. This can be considered a conditional disadvantage: ferries are equipped with all amenities and entertainment services for a comfortable and meaningful cruise.

high-speed-ferry-sea-753821.jpg

Pros and cons of cargo ferry transportation

Ferry cargo transportation has a number of advantages:

  •  Fast preparation of ferries in ports.
  • Prevention of ferry downtime.
  • The possibility of saving on cargo transportation due to their movement from one mode of transport to another.
  • Safety of transported goods.
  • Prompt delivery of goods by reducing the time of transshipment costs.
  • Simplicity of commercial operations aimed at transferring goods to other vehicles.

Cargo ferry crossings have some weaknesses:

  • During ferry transportation of loaded trains, the total volume of transported cargo is half as much as on other vessels of similar carrying capacity.
  • The cost of constructing a ferry is much higher in comparison with other watercraft.
  • The use of ferries implies the involvement of special equipment for berths, including lifting and mating equipment, sluice pools.

And yet the minor disadvantages of ferry services cannot outweigh their obvious advantages. Traveling by ferry is comfortable, profitable and very convenient, which is much more important than conventional disadvantages. Ferries are no less relevant for cargo transportation: they provide fast and unhindered delivery of important goods over long distances.

How to travel by ferry cheap

Privacy policy

Travel Mate

  • Air tickets
  • App for iPhone
  • App for Android on Google Play
  • App for Android on RuStore
  • App for Android on Amazon
  • App for Android on Microsoft Store

Subscribe to our news

Copyright © 2024 ferry2.app. All rights reserved.

IMAGES

  1. Are ferries safe? Why the dangers of ferries are nothing to worry about

    disadvantages of ferry travel

  2. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Travelling By Ship

    disadvantages of ferry travel

  3. Pros and cons of ferries in comparison with other modes of transport

    disadvantages of ferry travel

  4. 10 Primary Advantages and Disadvantages of Water Transport

    disadvantages of ferry travel

  5. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Travelling By Ship

    disadvantages of ferry travel

  6. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Traveling By Boat (2022)

    disadvantages of ferry travel

COMMENTS

  1. 10 Primary Advantages and Disadvantages of Water Transport

    Here are the primary advantages of water transport to know about and enjoy when you're travelling. 1. It's Peaceful and Relaxing. The first thing to know is that travelling by water is almost always a peaceful affair. It varies by the specific mode of transport you're taking, of course. But, in general, you're in for a nice and relaxing ...

  2. Advantages and disadvantages of traveling by boat

    One of the main disadvantages of boat travel is its slower speed compared to air travel. While planes can travel long distances in a couple of hours, boats might take days or even weeks to reach their destinations. Weather-related delays can occur when traveling by boat, particularly during storms or rough seas.

  3. What are the disadvantages of travelling by ferry?

    In conclusion, while ferry travel offers its own set of advantages, such as scenic views and a relaxed atmosphere, it is important to be aware of the potential disadvantages. These can include delays, higher costs, limited amenities, the risk of seasickness, and restricted accessibility.

  4. The risks of ferry travel

    The risks of ferry travel. By Mick Hamer. 18 August 1990. THEN the Herald of Free Enterprise capsized off the Belgian port of Zeebrugge in 1987, killing 193 people, not many naval architects were ...

  5. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Water Transport

    One of the major advantages of water transport is that it's relatively cheap to travel long distances by boat. For example, in the Philippines, a ferry ride is much cheaper than a flight. Not to mention, it's also a lot more scenic! 2. It's A Very Efficient Way To Move A Car Or Luggage.

  6. The Ultimate Guide To Traveling By Ferry

    These are the top 7 things you need to know about traveling by long-distance ferry: 1. Your experience will vary depending on the operator and country. Ferries come in all shapes and sizes, some will only transport people while others will also transport vehicles. Some might come with a pre-assigned seat, but most of the time you just take ...

  7. Basics: Where Can Ferries Succeed?

    Really successful ferries, like New York's Staten Island Ferry or Hong Kong's Star Ferry, have all of these features. At a smaller scale, Brisbane's cross river ferries and Vancouver's False Creek ferries, both with just one employee per vehicle, scale well for short trips across a water barrier. The romantic and scenic qualities of ...

  8. Are ferries safe? Why the dangers of ferries are ...

    Here's a breakdown of the dangers of travelling by ferry and why you shouldn't let them worry you. Generally travelling by ferry is usually considered one of the safest ways to travel. Ferry disasters are very rare, even if the more prominent ones are very memorable. Most ferry accidents are caused by unsuitable weather, overcrowding, and ...

  9. Ferry or fly? A sustainable travel dilemma

    With the train leg adding a further 13 kg CO 2, the ferry and train option, appears to be 46 kg CO 2 (65%) worse than the flight option. For balance, I checked some other sources for estimates of the flight emissions, resulting in the following estimates: 70 kg CO 2 e - Pure Leapfrog. 71 kg CO 2 e - Travel & Climate.

  10. Air vs Ferry Travel: The Benefits of Ferries

    This route starts from £68 for a P&O saver ticket with up to fifteen sailings daily at peak times. To enjoy the benefits of ferry travel for yourself, our P&O Dover to Calais route is among our most popular crossings and takes you to the French coast in just a 90-minute journey. So, remember, when you arrive at Calais with P&O, you're just a ...

  11. PROS AND CONS OF TRAVELLING BY BOAT

    Disadvantages of travelling by boat: Feeling of drunkenness. This feeling can last for hours, days or weeks, depending on the length of your trip. Although if you think you're feeling seasick inside… wait until you get off the boat! Slow travel. It's not exactly cheap. Travelling by boat is somewhat expensive, but it's totally worth it.

  12. Is it OK to travel by ferry?

    A standard car ferry emits just 10kg of CO2 per foot passenger for a return trip Dover-Calais. High-speed ferries, such as the catamarans that travel out to the Channel Islands, use engines with a ...

  13. The place of ferries in the sustainable transport debate

    Lewenhaupt: Northern Europe is likely the busiest region in the world when it comes to ferries due to the geography and ease of travel/trade in the European Union. On the travel side, we have seen an increasing competition from low-cost airlines for a number of years, while the freight works more as a complement to road/rail transportation and ...

  14. Sustainability and sea travel: the green future of ferry boats

    While many view sea travel as a sustainable form of transport, with figures suggesting it emits 25 per cent less carbon per passenger kilometre on an international trip compared with flying, much depends on a vessel's age, speed, fuel type and efficiency. However, thanks to a raft of new innovations, legislation and increased pressure from ...

  15. trains

    1. Ecopassenger provides a search engine comparing the environmental impact of various travel options. They're focussed on trains, planes, and automobiles, but some train routes include ferries. Comparing only trains shows, as expected, that trains are by far the most environmentally friendly in all aspects: Searching for Hamburg - München.

  16. Why Travel by Ferry?

    All in all, when you think about it, taking the ferry starts looking like a `ferry' attractive proposition. Sit back and let the world come to you on a ferry - as soon as you have the water beneath you, you'll feel you're already on holiday. Ferry travel offers lots of benefits. It's more relaxing, you can travel with your car and your pet and ...

  17. Navigation Safety for Ferries

    Nonetheless, one of the disadvantages of ferry transport is that it could be easily suspended due to weather conditions. In practice, the primary requirement of passenger transport by ferry is travel speed . Thus, in ship design, a ferry's tonnage is relatively small compared to that of a cruise vessel. In addition, the requirement for speed ...

  18. The Benefits of Travelling by Ferry

    Ferries provide a unique experience, where you can move around freely while you travel. The fresh sea air can also be good for your health, as well as a lower risk of developing conditions from lack of movement, which are a much higher risk on a plane. The ability to move around freely also means that you will have a more enjoyable time onboard.

  19. PDF Risk Assessment of Navigation Safety for Ferries

    one of the disadvantages of ferry transport is that it could be easily suspended due to weather conditions. In practice, the primary requirement of passenger transport by ferry is travel speed [3]. Thus, in ship design, a ferry's tonnage is relatively small compared to that of a cruise vessel.

  20. Top Tips for Ferry Travel in Greece with Kids

    DISADVANTAGES OF FERRY TRAVEL. Unlike flights, ferries are subject to cancellations and delays due to high winds. A pretty serious inconvenience, especially if you've been left stranded on an island without an airport. Port-side waiting areas are near non-existent, and uncomfortable. Hardly any seating and/or shade is available, so if you ...

  21. [2023] Hydrofoil Passenger Ferry: The Future of Fast and Efficient Travel

    Speed: Hydrofoil passenger ferries can reach speeds of up to 50 knots, making them significantly faster than conventional ferries. This means shorter travel times and more time to enjoy your destination. Efficiency: The hydrofoil technology used in these ferries reduces drag, resulting in improved fuel efficiency.

  22. Pros and cons of ferries in comparison with other modes of transport

    Thanks to ferry flights, stable communication is provided, comfortable transport interchanges are created. Next, we will take a detailed look at the key advantages and disadvantages of ferry transportation. This will help you decide on the right transport for travel or cargo delivery. About the advantages of ferries

  23. 10 Disadvantages of Travelling by Train

    10. No Control. There is much less flexibility than when traveling by car. Routes and timings cannot be altered to fit the needs of a particular individual or a family group. Once you get on a train, you are on board until you either have to change trains or you reach your destination.