• Top 15 Sunset Strip Bands
  • Songs About Managers & Execs
  • U2 Sphere Residency Ends
  • Revisiting Nirvana's Final Concert
  • 10 Rare Axl Rose Performances
  • Henley '70s Eagles Songs Ranked

Ultimate Classic Rock

How Journey Tried to Shake Things Up on ‘Look Into the Future’

Journey were already at a crossroads after just one jammy studio project.

The live shows weren't the problem. Journey were drawing nicely around the Bay Area concert circuit.

"They were like a jazz/fusion/rock kind of thing," manager Herbie Herbert told Melodic Rock in 2008. "We played with Weather Report, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Santana and Robin Trower and bands like that. And it just went over perfect, and I loved that original band and many people did."

But then Journey's self-titled debut stalled at a disappointing No. 138. Expectations were far higher for a group that boasted former members of Santana ( Gregg Rolie and Neal Schon ) and Frumious Bandersnatch (Ross Valory and George Tickner), and there were already rumblings from Columbia Records.

"We had built this cult audience in quite a few places, because we had toured extensively for three years – and very hard," Schon told Goldmine in 2013. "I would say nine months out of every year we toured, and we had built quite a following being one of the original jam bands in San Francisco. You know, people really enjoyed seeing us live. We weren't selling any records, but we were selling lots of tickets."

Listen to Journey's 'On a Saturday Nite'

Look Into the Future , issued in January 1976, was perfectly titled. They committed to becoming more song focused, while trying to retain the progressive touches that showcased Journey's musical chops on the first album. "We decided we'd taken that kind of music as far as we could," Rolie told Rolling Stone in 1980.

To some degree they succeeded, but only by separating these two impulses. Side One stacked more commercial-sounding moments like "On a Saturday Nite" and "Anyway" with a cover of "It's All Too Much " from the Beatles ' Yellow Submarine , then Journey stretched out more on the next side: "I'm Gonna Leave You" went just past seven minutes, while the episodic title song became their second-longest released song at 8:13.

They lost George Tickner, the band's rhythm guitarist, along the way – though he still ended up with two songwriting co-credits, "You're on Your Own" and "I'm Gonna Leave You." Undaunted, Journey released Look Into the Future and immediately headed out on a tour that lasted from February through December 1976, concluding at the Winterland in San Francisco.

"Lately, I think the band has gotten more loose and relaxed onstage, and it comes off," Rolie told Tom Vickers in 1976. "With George, there was a tenseness. He wasn't really into it. He likes writing, but onstage he didn't enjoy himself."

Schon also described the lineup shift as a form of addition by subtraction. "There are parts where you miss the sound of another guitar," he told Vickers, "but it gives us more space."

Listen to Journey's 'I'm Gonna Leave You'

Unfortunately, maintaining that rugged schedule didn't make a substantial impact on sales. Look Into the Future fared better than the band's eponymous first record but got to only No. 100. Still hopeful, Rolie said Journey took it all in stride.

"We were never discouraged, because every time we've gone out on the road, there's been growth," Rolie said back then . "We've learned more about each other, the music and the industry. Journey is a democratic situation that will last, because everyone is a little older now and more aware – and that's the only way a band can work. Everyone has their own musical taste and their own ideas, but we've learned how to use them to improve the group."

Yet it appeared there was an inherent commercial ceiling with this particular mixture of creative voices – especially when former tour mates in Kansas took a germ of an idea from Journey and turned it into a breakthrough hit. "I think if you'll listen to "I'm Gonna Leave [You]" on the Look Into the Future record," Herbert told Melodic Rock, "it's ' Carry On Wayward Son ' by Kansas. They just lifted it."

Journey tried shaking things up again on 1977's Next , toughening up their sound and even handing the microphone to Schon for two songs. But when that project halted at No. 85, larger changes were demanded by the band's label bosses.

"You look up and it's 1977, and they've toured all year – all through Europe with Santana and another big tour with ELO both in '76 and '77, and it just wasn't happening," Herbert noted. "So I was just in a complete scramble, and they were gonna drop the act. So there was a scramble to do something to modify what we were doing. So I said we'll change it: We'll go commercial."

Steve Perry 's phone would soon be ringing .

​​

Top 100 Live Albums

See Neal Schon Among Rock’s Forgotten Supergroups

More From Ultimate Classic Rock

Deen Castronovo Admits Journey Turmoil Drove Him Insane

Album picture of Look into the Future (Live)

Look into the Future (Live)

Listen to the album look into the future (live) by journey, album tracks, similar artists.

Find artists similar to Journey

journey look into the future live

1 609 483 fans

journey look into the future live

Steve Perry

19 515 fans

journey look into the future live

4 765 435 fans

journey look into the future live

2 602 471 fans

journey look into the future live

788 118 fans

journey look into the future live

Def Leppard

768 059 fans

journey look into the future live

536 107 fans

journey look into the future live

Bryan Adams

1 522 265 fans

journey look into the future live

4 884 078 fans

journey look into the future live

220 431 fans

journey look into the future live

3 227 567 fans

journey look into the future live

The Outfield

73 704 fans

journey look into the future live

Mötley Crüe

715 170 fans

journey look into the future live

Rod Stewart

1 257 324 fans

journey look into the future live

Iron Maiden

3 358 044 fans

Discography

Find all of Journey's titles

journey look into the future live

Live in Concert at Lollapalooza

journey look into the future live

Greatest Hits 2

journey look into the future live

Live In Houston 1981: The Escape Tour (2022 Remaster)

journey look into the future live

The Essential Journey

journey look into the future live

Greatest Hits Live

journey look into the future live

Trial By Fire

journey look into the future live

Greatest Hits (2024 Remaster)

journey look into the future live

Journey's Greatest Hits

journey look into the future live

Raised On Radio

Sign up to listen to the full track

No payment required

Search results

No searches just yet.

  • Download Shazam

Look Into the Future (Live) - Journey

Look Into the Future (Live)

journey look into the future live

Concerts Nearby

  • Jul 25 Jul 25, 2024 Hersheypark Stadium Hershey

Top Songs By Journey

journey look into the future live

Look into the Future

Look into the Future

STREAM OR BUY:

Release Date

Discography timeline, allmusic review, user reviews, track listing, similar albums, moods and themes.

scorecard pixel

Look Into the Future

January 1, 1976 8 Songs, 41 minutes ℗ 1976 Sony Music Entertainment

More By Journey

Featured on.

Apple Music Classic Rock

You Might Also Like

Ronnie Montrose

Pat Travers

Mama's Pride

Select a country or region

Africa, middle east, and india.

  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Congo, The Democratic Republic Of The
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Niger (English)
  • Congo, Republic of
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Sierra Leone
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania, United Republic Of
  • Turkmenistan
  • United Arab Emirates

Asia Pacific

  • Indonesia (English)
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Malaysia (English)
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • New Zealand
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Philippines
  • Solomon Islands
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • France (Français)
  • Deutschland
  • Luxembourg (English)
  • Moldova, Republic Of
  • North Macedonia
  • Portugal (Português)
  • Türkiye (English)
  • United Kingdom

Latin America and the Caribbean

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina (Español)
  • Bolivia (Español)
  • Virgin Islands, British
  • Cayman Islands
  • Chile (Español)
  • Colombia (Español)
  • Costa Rica (Español)
  • República Dominicana
  • Ecuador (Español)
  • El Salvador (Español)
  • Guatemala (Español)
  • Honduras (Español)
  • Nicaragua (Español)
  • Paraguay (Español)
  • St. Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • St. Vincent and The Grenadines
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Turks and Caicos
  • Uruguay (English)
  • Venezuela (Español)

The United States and Canada

  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
  • Estados Unidos (Español México)
  • الولايات المتحدة
  • États-Unis (Français France)
  • Estados Unidos (Português Brasil)
  • 美國 (繁體中文台灣)

Live Into The Future

  • View history

Live Into The Future is a live album released in 2012.

Journey Live Into The Future

Track Listing [ ]

  • Mystery Mountain (Live)
  • In My Lonely Feeling (Live)
  • Look Into The Future (Live)
  • On A Saturday Nite (Live)
  • Midnight Dreamer (Live)
  • Of A Lifetime (Live)
  • You're On Your Own (Live)
  • It's All Too Much (Live)
  • In The Morning Day (Live)
  • 1 Frontiers Tour
  • 2 Journey (band)
  • 3 Natural Thing

New anaconda species said to be largest ever found during filming of Will Smith docuseries

A group of scientists uncovered the nearly 10 million-year-old species with help from the huaorani people while filming a disney+ docuseries called 'pole to pole with will smith'.

journey look into the future live

A giant anaconda species thought to be the largest in the world has been captured deep in the Amazon of Ecuador by a team of scientists from The University of Queensland.

The group of scientists, led by professor Bryan Fry , uncovered the nearly 10-million-year-old species with help from the Indigenous Huaorani people while filming " Pole to Pole with Will Smith ," a National Geographic series streaming on Disney+ and hosted by the Oscar winner.

“The size of these magnificent creatures was incredible," Fry said in a news release . "One female anaconda we encountered measured an astounding 6.3 meters (20.8 feet) long."

The invitation by Huaorani Chief Penti Baihua to enter the Baihuaeri Huaorani Territory in the Ecuadorian Amazon was "one of only a handful granted since the tribe’s first contact in 1958," Fry told USA TODAY. “Our team received a rare invitation − to explore the region and collect samples from a population of anacondas."

The journey into the jungle

Chief Baihua led Fry's team on a 10-day search for the anacondas, which are considered sacred to the tribe.

The team took canoes downriver in the Bameno region, where they found "several anacondas lurking in the shallows, lying in wait for prey," Fry said.

The group then captured several specimens of the species, which they named the northern green anaconda (Eunectes akayima).

"The key to understanding the discovery is the difference in the geographic range of anaconda species," Fry told USA TODAY.

The Amazon has two separate basins. The larger basin in the south (Brazil, Bolivia, Peru and parts of French Guiana) is home to the green anaconda, from which the northern green anaconda comes. The smaller basin in the north (Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Suriname, Trinidad, Venezuela and parts of French Guiana) is home to the newly discovered northern green anaconda.

The two species differ genetically by 5.5%, Fry said. “It’s quite significant – to put it in perspective, humans differ from chimpanzees by only about 2%."

Rumors of larger snakes

“There are anecdotal reports from the Huaorani people of other anacondas in the area measuring more than 7.5 meters long (24.6 feet) and weighing around 500 kilograms (1,102 pounds)," Fry said, sharing with USA TODAY that Chief Baihua's son Marcelo Tepeña Baihua has scars from a snake about that size.

"The scars were clearly from a truly massive snake. They say that one wasn’t even the biggest they’ve ever seen," Fry said. "So it's clear that the snakes in the Huaorani lands are indeed the biggest of all anacondas."

Details on the snakes found have been published in the journal MDPI Diversity .

Future work

Fry says his team's work in the Amazon is far from done. Pollutants such as cadmium and lead have woven their way into "the delicate fabric of this ecosystem as consequences of the frequent oil spills plaguing the Yasuni Amazon," Fry said.

Fry's team hopes to keep an eye on the reproduction of the northern green anaconda to gain greater insight into the health of the ecosystem at large.

"Our future expeditions will focus on the collection and analysis of soil, water and biological samples, employing cutting-edge techniques to trace the pathways of these contaminants," Fry said. "By understanding how these metals affect the endocrine systems of the Amazon's wildlife, we can begin to unravel the long-term consequences of exposure and devise strategies to mitigate these effects."

Though the future of the newly discovered species is insecure, the journey through the jungle was full of "wonder," even where there were challenges, Fry said.

"I like nothing better than being overheated and underwashed while wading through swamps in search of giant snakes. This discovery is the highlight of my career.”

Politics latest: Rwanda plan suffers successive defeats in Lords - as Galloway criticised for 'repulsive' Holocaust comparison

The House of Lords has delivered a damning verdict on the government's flagship Rwanda deportation plan. Meanwhile, firebrand George Galloway is back in Westminster after being sworn in as Rochdale's MP - and Jeremy Hunt is hinting at tax cuts in this week's budget.

Monday 4 March 2024 21:15, UK

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

  • Galloway criticised for Holocaust remark
  • Corbyn launches legal action against Farage
  • Lords deals successive blows to Rwanda plan
  • Explained: What's happened in the Lords tonight
  • Budget 2023 : What to expect  | How to watch  | Why Hunt's willing to sacrifice public spending |  Podcast: Are tax cuts a vote winner?
  • Live reporting by Ben Bloch and (earlier)  Faith Ridler

As the country gears up for the general election, Wednesday's budget may be the last before the voters go to the polls.

Hailed as "a budget to save the Tory party", speculation has been mounting that the chancellor will cut taxes as a last-ditch attempt to boost the Conservatives' plunging support.

To afford the move, funding to public services could be slashed - but Jeremy Hunt has insisted any cuts will be done "responsibly".

On today's episode, Sophy Ridge looks ahead to the budget. She's joined by deputy political editor Sam Coates and pollster Scarlett Maguire to unpack whether cutting taxes really is the way to a Conservative election win.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

When is the budget?

This spring budget is on Wednesday.

The budget is accompanied by economic and fiscal outlooks from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the independent public finances forecaster.

What time is the announcement?

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt will deliver the budget statement in the House of Commons.

The announcement usually starts at 12.30pm - directly after Prime Minister's Questions - and lasts about an hour.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer will give his response as soon as the speech is over.

Before the announcement, the chancellor poses for the press with the red despatch box containing the budget papers.

How can I watch and follow the announcements?

You can follow all the key announcements in the Politics Hub here.

You can also watch the event live on Sky News on Sky channel 501, Virgin 602, and Freeview 233.

If you want to watch on YouTube, watch the Sky News live channel here.

What is included in the budget?

The budget lays out the government's plans for raising and lowering taxes.

The chancellor will also speak on government plans for public spending, including on schools, health and defence.

The statement tends to start with a review of the nation's finances and its economic situation, moving on to the proposals for taxation.

You can read more about the details in the budget here...

By Faye Brown , political reporter

Rishi Sunak has tonight suffered a number of sizeable defeats in the House of Lords over his controversial bill to rescue the stalled Rwanda plan.

Peers have voted through five amendments which, if enacted in law, would make it harder for parliament to declare the African nation 'safe' and would require the government to comply with domestic and international law.

This would effectively kill the central purpose of the legislation - which aims to prevent further legal challenges against the policy after it was ruled unlawful by the UK's Supreme Court .

The votes don't scupper the bill entirely, but set into motion the process of parliamentary "ping pong" between the Lords and the Commons until an agreement is reached.

As well as compelling judges to regard Rwanda as safe, Mr Sunak's Safety of Rwanda Bill is designed to give ministers the power to disregard key sections of the UK's Human Rights Act and other international rules that stand in the way of deportations.

Peers from across the political divide have criticised it because they believe it breaks international law.

Read more below:

One year ago, Rishi Sunak made five pledges for voters to judge him on.

The prime minister met his pledge to halve inflation by the end of 2023, leaving four pledges outstanding.

However, he is faring less well with his other pledges.

It has been confirmed the UK is now in recession, which means the PM's pledge to grow the economy is not being met.

With the general election approaching, how is Mr Sunak doing on delivering his other promises?

You can see the progress for yourself below.

Finally on Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge , we are looking at a news story that sounds like something out of a spy novel - Russia has intercepted a discussion among the German military about operations in Ukraine.

The Russians managed to access a chat which was hosted on the Webex conference platform - rather than a secure army platform.

In the 38-minute call, the German air force chief discussed possible supplies of Taurus missiles - a pretty serious breach, and embarrassing for the Germans.

But this is not the first time the powers that be were not so careful about very classified information.

Back in 2000, there was a furore when it was revealed an MI6 officer mislaid a laptop containing classified material after drinking at a tapas bar in central London.

A few years ago, more classified defence documents - which went missing - were discovered by a member of the public in a reportedly "soggy heap" behind a bus stop in Kent.

And just last year, official documents about a "hunter killer" Royal Navy submarine were reportedly discovered in the loos of a Wetherspoon in Cumbria.

Our panellists describe the German leak as "really serious" which will "seriously damage trust, particularly among the Five Eyes Allies in Germany".

And we ask a former Home Office adviser whether he ever accidentally left classified documents in a Wetherspoon pub.

Watch the full discussion here:

That concludes tonight's edition of Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge - scroll down for all the key moments and highlights.

Next on Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge , we are hearing from  Daniel Kebede , general secretary of the National Education Union, and we start by asking what he wants to hear from the chancellor at the budget.

He says Rishi Sunak and his team have previously asserted that eduction is a "silver bullet", but adds: "We haven't seen any evidence of them investing at all."

He has written to the government "multiple times" to ask for funding to fix school buildings, improve special needs eduction, and restore funding, but no investment has been forthcoming.

"We're really hoping for them to change course this week," he says.

Sophy puts to Mr Kebede that the government would say that they are prioritising education in a bad economic environment, and he replies: "Children wouldn't say that, nor would the parents or the teachers in schools currently."

He goes on: "We literally have schools crumbling around the heads of children due to this government's neglect of eduction."

He also cites "record class sizes" due to low teacher pay driving people out of the profession.

"The reality is, education at the moment is on the brink - we really do need to see some investment."

He says the public wants to see proper investment in public services, rather than large tax cuts.

Mr Kebede also calls on Labour to be "much more ambitious" than the plans they have currently announced, saying there needs to be a "plan of action" to restore education and tackle child poverty.

Next, we are speaking with our Politics Hub  panel about the Rochdale by-election and George Galloway being sworn in to parliament.

James Starkie , former Tory Home Office adviser, says the result will "change the debate" and Mr Galloway will "clearly capture the media attention on a regular basis", which both parties will have to deal with.

Whether his Workers' Party of Great Britain will actually impact the election more broadly is "hard to tell right now".

Sir Ben Bradshaw , Labour MP and former cabinet minister, rejects Mr Galloway's assertion that Labour was "crushed", and says the party "probably would have won" had they supported a candidate.

"The worry I have is that Galloway will add to the general toxicity of this debate," he says.

Sir Ben said he "could not understand" Rishi Sunak making a "ridiculous" speech on Friday criticising Mr Galloway's win, saying he likes nothing more than attention.

"If you watch how Labour MPs and Sir Keir Starmer react to him, I think they will do their upmost to ignore him because he craves attention - that's what he lived off."

He adds: "The best tactic is to completely ignore him... for the good of our country and for the good of one's own sanity."

The House of Lords has been busy tonight, delivering a bit of ruthless battering to the government's Rwanda plan.

What have they been up to?

Peers there have been voting on amendments to legislation that would see the country deemed a safe place to send asylum seekers, which the prime minister has been trying to get passed to bypass a Supreme Court ruling from last year that deemed it unsafe.

Only once Rwanda has been ruled safe can the government hope to start sending migrants there.

MPs are set to back it when it comes back to the Commons, but in the meantime the Lords gets a say.

What have they done?

These amendments are designed to make the bill more palatable to disapproving peers - perhaps the most undermining of them from the government's perspective would be to ensure the bill maintains "full compliance with domestic and international law".

That would effectively kill the core purpose of the bill, which seeks to sideline the influence of the courts.

With all five amendments presented tonight having been backed by the House of Lords, it's the worst series of defeats peers have inflicted upon Rishi Sunak since he became prime minister.

What does it all mean?

Our chief political correspondent Jon Craig says what's really significant tonight is the "scale of these defeats", with Tories including former members of John Major's cabinet having voted against the government.

The first three votes were all backed by majorities of more than 100, with the other two well above 80.

More amendments will be voted on this Wednesday, before the bill goes back before MPs on 18 March.

The government still hopes to pass the bill by Easter and then get flights off the ground, with the Lords' opposition largely symbolic.

Mr Sunak still won't be happy, though - you may remember he urged peers not to vote against the bill earlier this year, declaring it to be the will of the people.

Next with Tory party deputy chair James Daly, we turn to the debate over funding public services over tax cuts.

Mr Daly insists the chancellor will "always act responsibly", but his view is that tax cuts are needed.

"I believe that individuals are better at spending their own money than the government," he says.

He also says that any money spent must be good value: "We can't just simply talk all the time about pound signs - we have to relate pound signs to outcomes."

Mr Daly says the government is spending "record amounts of money" on the NHS and other key public services.

"After that, surely it's not outrageous to say I want people to have more money in their pocket to make their own decisions in terms of what they want to spend it on."

Next on Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge , we are hearing from deputy chair of the Conservative Party, James Daly.

We start by asking about the assertion from one of his MPs, Paul Scully, that the party needs to seek the middle ground to expand its voter base, rather than swing heavily to the right (see previous post).

He says that what's important for politicians is being "motivated by the right principles, however they are described".

Talking about left, right, or anything else means we "miss the point", and the government is "acting upon... the concerns of our constituents and what we perceive as the wider interests of the country".

The biggest issue on the doorstep for him until 2019 was immigration, he says, which some might label as right-wing.

"That's why I support this prime minister in terms of the Rwanda policy and other immigration policies to address that," he says.

"But that's not right-wing - that's just acting upon the concerns of constituents throughout the country."

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

journey look into the future live

For more audio journalism and storytelling, download New York Times Audio , a new iOS app available for news subscribers.

Biden, Trump and a Split Screen at the Texas Border

The president and his likely election opponent visited the political hot spot on the same day and gave dueling speeches..

This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email [email protected] with any questions.

From “The New York Times,” I’m Sabrina Tavernise, and this is “The Daily.”

On Thursday, the two presumptive nominees for President, Joe Biden and Donald Trump, traveled to Texas, where they gave dueling speeches on what is shaping up to be perhaps the most important issue in the 2024 election — the flow of migrants across the border.

Today, my colleague, White House correspondent Zolan Kanno-Youngs on Biden’s risky bid to take Trump’s biggest advantage and use it against him.

It’s Friday, March 1.

So Zolan, both President Biden and former President Trump visited the border in Texas on Thursday.

And it’s 6 PM. They just finished talking. And it was kind of this split-screen performance, right? These dueling speeches, one after the other. Tell us what happened.

Well, these dueling trips to the border really do show us that we are in the general election at this point. The fact that both of the likely nominees chose to travel to the border really does show you just how much immigration has risen to be one of the most important concerns amongst voters, and recent polling also shows that. And that coincides with a record number of crossings at the southwest border.

And it’s not just limited to states along the border, but you have migrant surges in cities throughout the United States. And it’s increasingly becoming a huge political vulnerability for the White House. And you see the former President trying to seize on that vulnerability.

OK. So that’s why these two men go down there. What do they say when they’re down there? Describe the scene for me.

What you saw were two different leaders who, in very different ways, tried to convince Americans that they are best suited to address this humanitarian issue.

That’s great, Governor. Thank you very much, everybody. This is an honor to be with you.

So for the former President, he goes to Eagle Pass, Texas, standing just near the Rio Grande.

Walls and wheels — I always said it’s one thing never gets obsolete — a wall and a wheel.

He’s near a makeshift border barrier topped with razor wire as well. So you see the optics of trying to look tough on the border. And he once again tried to seize on this issue to stoke division and hate.

Just four days ago, an illegal alien in Louisiana was arrested for brutally raping a 14-year-old girl while holding a knife to her throat. And he then allegedly robbed a man who was getting out of his car in front of his home and repeatedly stabbed him in the face, in the back, and the face, many, many times.

And he even used sort of warlike language when describing this issue.

— incredible. And I’ll say this. It’s a military operation.

He called it a “military operation.”

I mean, we have a military — this is like a war.

So you definitely saw the former President sort of return to that anti-immigration strategy to attack Democrats.

It’s an honor to have your support and your endorsement, and likewise, me to you. Thank you very much. Great to be here. Thank you.

So essentially, today, we saw Trump being Trump on immigration, doubling down on the same demagoguery that he’s been using, really, since he first declared his run for the presidency back in 2016.

Right. The rhetoric is familiar, but let’s be clear. What the former President is planning, if he’s elected, would go even further than the policies that we saw when he was in office. My colleagues have reported already that former President Trump is drawing up policies that take his immigration crackdown even further.

He’s planning on sending agents out into the country to round up undocumented immigrants, scale up as well giant camps to detain undocumented immigrants, reinstitute travel bans as well, including the travel bans that were against Muslim-majority countries when he was in office. They’re even considering trying to end birthright citizenship, which basically says that babies born in the United States to undocumented parents would be entitled to American citizenship.

Without a doubt, while former President Trump’s remarks today may seem familiar, you should know that what he’s planning, if he’s elected to office, would take his anti-immigration agenda a step further.

OK, so that’s the Trump side of the split screen. What did Biden do?

So in a way, when you look at President Biden’s remarks, it was very different.

Hello, folks. Good afternoon. Before we —

For one, he wasn’t in front of barriers or razor wire. He was inside a government facility, standing alongside border patrol agents, outlining a bill that was recently negotiated in the Senate.

Then months ago, my team began a serious negotiation and a bipartisan group of senators, Democrat leading, conservative Republicans —

This legislation would have enacted some of the more conservative changes to the border that we’ve seen in decades.

It’s the toughest set of border security reforms we’ve ever seen in this country. It’s pretty basic.

Rapidly turning away migrants at the border, also making it more difficult for migrants to obtain asylum at the border as well as bolstering resources at the border. It had a lot of the measures that Republicans have been calling for, for years, but House Republicans taking a cue from former President Trump, tanked that legislation. Many of them would prefer that it was an issue that could be used to attack the President and didn’t want to deliver him a policy win in an election year. And today, you saw President Biden criticizing them for it.

It’s time for the speakers and some of my Republican friends in Congress who are blocking this bill to show a little spine.

Saying that they were putting politics over, actually, solutions to this.

Let’s remember who we work for, for God’s sake. We work for the American people.

But then towards the end of his remarks —

I understand my predecessor’s in Eagle Pass today. So here’s what I would say to Mr. Trump.

We heard something that I haven’t heard before — a direct dare to former President Trump to actually join President Biden in working together to actually address this issue.

Join me, or I’ll join you in telling the Congress to pass this bipartisan border security bill. We can do it together. You know and I know, it’s the toughest, most efficient, most effective border security bill this country has ever seen.

And there, you really see, possibly more so than we’ve seen thus far in the Biden era, President Biden directly challenging the border security bona fides of the former President.

There’s nothing, nothing beyond our capacity, nothing, when we work together. And of all things we should be working together on is, this, we have the formula to get it done. God bless you all, and may God protect our border patrol, and God protect our troops. Now, I’d like to turn this over to Secretary Mayorkas. Thank you.

As someone who’s been covering this for some years now, I didn’t expect something that was as direct as those comments today. And it not only shows just how much Democrats are sort of intent on emphasizing border security in this election season, but it also affirmed that the White House is really going to lean into this strategy of going on the offensive on border security.

So this is interesting. So Biden is not only saying that he, too, cares about border security and he wants to really crack down on crossings — something we haven’t heard from Democrats so much of late — but now, he’s turning it around on the Republicans, right? Actually going on the offensive, saying, not only am I tough on this, they’re actually weak on this. Like, they’re the ones who won’t do anything to fix it. They’re the problem. It’s on them.

They’re the ones that are neglecting this crisis. We are the ones that are actually proposing solutions for this. But I have to say, this is really going to be challenging for the White House and President Biden.

You have this sort of real difficult balancing act of explaining the legislative challenges and talking about your legislative proposals for this crisis. But that’s going up against Trump’s strategy of stoking division and stoking anger on this issue. Former President Trump has proven that he can galvanize his base with his strategy. Whether or not this works, that’s something to watch, moving forward.

Right. It’s kind of a triple axel, right? Like, when you think about it, he’s trying to get a regular voter to see the border crisis, to look at what’s happening on the border. And instead of just blaming the guy in charge, him, he’s asking that voter to understand that there was this bipartisan bill in Congress, that Biden himself had endorsed it, was prepared to sign it — that he would have been tough on border issues, but that the Republicans wouldn’t bring it to a vote, because Trump didn’t want them to.

It’s not a simple message. It’s much easier for Trump. All he has to do is say, hey, the border is a mess. The other guy is in charge. Blame him.

Yes. I think that’s right. Even listening to his remarks today, there’s layers to it, right? He’s sort of trying to outline the legislative challenges here, which is, to be fair, very Biden. But without a doubt, what was surprising again is, for most of his time in office, immigration and the border has been a thorn in the President’s side, almost a political headache, something that Democrats tried to distance themselves from. Now, you’re seeing them lean in and emphasize border security and almost say, we are the ones that will address this issue.

We’ll be right back.

So Zolan, how did we get here? I mean, how did we go from Biden avoiding this immigration issue, like the plague, to kind of tiptoeing into it, to now trying to use it as a cudgel against Trump?

I mean, to understand this, you really have to go back to Biden’s 2020 campaign.

We believe in freedom of religion. That’s why we’ll end the Muslim ban.

This was, of course, after the anti-immigration agenda that President Trump implemented that included a travel ban against Muslim-majority countries.

They got separated from their parents. And it makes us a laughingstock and violates every notion of who we are as a nation.

And that included extreme policies at the border such as family separation that Democrats spent their time during the 2020 campaign condemning. So of course, coming into office, you had Democrats using language that was much more pro-immigration.

Within 100 days, I’m going to send to the United States Congress a pathway to citizenship for over 11 million undocumented people.

You heard the President pledge to restore humanity, order, compassion to the immigration system.

And those who come seeking asylum, we should immediately have the capacity to absorb them, keep them safe until they can be heard.

But practically, on the ground, there were some Trump-era policies that did stay in place. That included something known as Title 42. This was a pandemic emergency rule that essentially sealed the border to asylum seekers.

The administration also began to deport Haitian migrants back to Haiti as well. And there were photos of border patrol agents trying to keep migrants from entering into the country.

Right, I remember that.

So while, rhetorically, we were hearing often about compassion and humanity on the ground, we were seeing, once again, a reliance on deterrence.

OK, so during the campaign in 2020, he was kind of speaking the language of the left, in large part as a reaction to the extreme policies that Trump had enacted. But he quickly moderated.

Yeah, that’s right. And even though some of those policies were in place, the number of crossings continued to grow. Some of that’s outside of the president’s control. I mean, in the wake of the pandemic of climate change, of a global migration trend, as well as the perception that the election of President Biden would mean a more welcoming approach to the border, you had nationalities from all over the world attempting to cross into the United States.

And so as this problem continued to grow worse and crossings continued to surge, the pressure is really building on the White House. Republicans relentlessly are asking President Biden when he’s going to go to the border. I was actually with Vice President Kamala Harris when she traveled to Guatemala to address the root causes of migration.

And even there, she was being asked, Why are you here and not at the US-Mexico border? And initially, those requests were dismissed by top White House officials as, that’s just going to be sort of political theater. But eventually, they did succumb to the pressure and each make a visit to the border.

So Biden and Harris go to the border eventually. But there’s a real reluctance to engage with this at all, publicly.

Yeah, that’s right. So Republicans at the time really did sense an opening. And in the spring of 2022, we have a pivotal moment that we all know well by now. This is when Texas Governor Greg Abbott starts to put vulnerable migrant families and bus them to cities led by Democrats.

This continues to escalate. I remember getting a call one morning from a source who said that a bus of migrants had been dropped off in front of the Vice President’s residence as well.

Oh, my goodness.

And you know, it is important to remember, much of this was happening without giving a heads-up to some of the organizations or officials in these cities. One result, though, is this only exacerbates a humanitarian crisis, but also a political crisis for the White House.

And it causes, of course, a crisis for these cities, right? I mean, we’ve covered this in New York. Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Hochul are up in arms. They’re demanding funding from the federal government. They’re even going to Mexico to say, don’t come.

Exactly. So now, you have Democratic mayors that are saying they’re concerned not just about their municipal budgets, but also the political pressure that they are facing as well as more and more migrants are bused into these cities. And as a result, many of those Democratic leaders turn that pressure back on the White House and say, we need to get some control over this issue.

Right, they’re criticizing the Biden administration directly. Like, it’s not just Republican officials. It’s his own party coming after him for this.

That’s exactly right. And look. After a legal fight, Title 42 was lifted, and the administration is scrambling for solutions to the border. And then this interesting thing happens, which is that the issue of the border no longer just impacts immigration and the President’s domestic agenda, but also threatens to impact his foreign policy agenda.

Biden and the White House have seen rallying support for Ukraine as one of his crowning achievements. But Republicans increasingly make it clear that if he wants to continue to do that, they will only support him if he moves forward with changes at the border.

So while it might have seemed like the Republicans were actually forcing Biden to address the border, actually, Biden wanted to address the border for all the reasons you’re describing. And this was his chance to do it.

Right. So publicly, you would hear the White House at this point say, look, we need to pass this aid for Ukraine. Lives are at stake overseas. And the White House officials think that’s true, absolutely.

But I also talked to President’s allies, to Democrats, who were saying, hey, look, these negotiations here actually may present an opportunity. This may be a way to enact some of the policies that maybe, in closed-door meetings, we’ve discussed that we want, that we need, but in the past couldn’t speak about publicly, because of the backlash you would get from immigration advocates and the progressive flank of the party. But also, it could be a way for the President to say, look, Republicans, you guys have criticized me over this crisis throughout my presidency.

Well, here’s a solution. And it not only will be key for my foreign policy agenda, but it also is a way to actually implement some of the restrictions that have been so polarizing within the party in past years. But now is the time where we have an opportunity to implement some of those border restrictions.

So Senate Democrats and Senate Republicans at this point are working out a bill that would turn away many asylum seekers, make it harder to gain asylum while increasing resources at the border. The White House is sort of behind Senate Democrats, continuing to support that bill.

And you’re also seeing the President lean in a bit more into these negotiations. Towards the end of last year, while facing questions from reporters, there was a pivotal moment where he said, no, I am open to significant compromises at the border.

Yes, so this is the big shift, right? I mean, Biden is now seeing the immigration issue, and he’s endorsing some very, very restrictive policies on the border, not as a concession he’s willing to make just to get Ukraine funding. He’s actually seeing these very restrictive policies as good politics for him within his own party.

Right. And we continue to see the White House go even further in this direction. When the House Republicans sink this bill, taking a cue from former President Trump, who preferred that it be an issue to be used against the White House rather than a policy win for President Biden, you start to see the White House continue to lean in. He echoes the language once used by the Trump administration, saying, look, if you had sent me this bill, I would shut down the border.

And that leads to today, where you have really seen them try to attempt this offensive strategy. Remember, visiting the border was once something that was almost taboo within the party. You did it when you faced calls to visit.

But now, you have President Biden going, using the border as a backdrop and saying, no longer will the Democratic Party be accused of not putting forward solutions to this crisis, but actually, it’s the Republicans that are neglecting what is one of the more pressing issues in this nation.

OK, so that explains why Biden had decided to go on the offensive on this issue. But as we said, this is very hard, right? So let’s play this out. If this somehow works, what will Biden’s immigration strategy actually look like? I mean, for Biden to be on the offensive on this difficult issue as the campaign really ramps up.

Well, I think that you can expect him to continue to call Congress to do something about this. But let’s be clear. They are considering going at this themselves as well. My colleagues and I reported last week that the White House right now is considering executive actions that would essentially replicate some of what was being negotiated in that Senate bipartisan bill.

So that includes measures that would make it harder for migrants to obtain asylum at the border, and essentially allowing the President to shut down the border if crossings surpassed a certain amount. So that would be, I mean, a drastic change.

Very radical.

Right. I mean, it would be some of the most conservative, restrictive changes we’ve seen definitely under the Biden White House. But this is challenging. This is tricky, right? So for, really, throughout the Biden presidency, Republicans have been saying, there’s more you can do on the border by yourself, even though the President has said, Congress needs to take action on this issue.

Basically making the point that, hey, guy, if you’re doing this now, why didn’t you do it three years ago, right?

Why didn’t you do it three years ago, right. And I’ve already been told by border patrol agents and Trump allies that that is something that they would question the White House on if they issue these executive actions. And then also, he would face pressure as well from the progressive flank of his party.

You already have progressives that have said this strategy by the White House is sort of playing a game designed by Republicans in a way. Remember, progressives and Democrats have historically called for legalization as a tradeoff for border security. So if he moves forward with these actions, you have to wonder, would he face even more pressure from the progressive flank of his party?

So he’s getting squeezed politically. And then even if he was going to take action here, there’s also a question about whether he would even be able to implement it. Executive actions, when it comes to immigration, often run into legal trouble. They often run into the courts. So even if he were to go at it alone, you’re likely going to see a legal fight ensue.

OK, so this is very fraught on a number of different fronts. And if it kind of backfires, really, it leaves him out there in the wind, drawing lots of attention to his biggest vulnerability, in front of the whole country. Like, he could end up looking really bad, not just to the people who want him to be tough on the border, but also to the progressives who are mad that he’s trying to do this in the first place.

I think that’s right. I mean, one thing that is certain about this shift, this strategy by the White House, is it’s going to put the spotlight on this crisis. It’s going to put the spotlight on this issue. It’s going to put the spotlight on a policy that, historically, Republicans have wanted more attention on.

So look, the White House has been squeezed on the border and immigration since President Biden came into office. There’s no easy solutions for really addressing it. And all of that amounts to why it’s one of the more frustrating issues that he currently has.

But then again, if — and it’s a big if, of course — Biden is able to pull off that high-wire act of turning this issue back on the Republicans, and Trump specifically, it will have neutralized what has been a very potent issue for the Republicans, which would kind justify the risk, right?

I think that’s right. And that’s certainly what the White House is hoping for. This is all part of an effort to do a course correction in a way and sort of meet Americans where they’re at. And you know, polls indicate that Americans do want more restrictions at the border.

Just recent polling this week showed that immigration has surpassed the economy as the most important issue right now in this election cycle. Other polling as well showed that Americans do support some of the measures, the restrictive measures that were in that bipartisan Senate bill. So you can see why the White House is attempting this shift.

So actually, weirdly, this issue that’s been so contentious in our country is becoming something of a consensus issue.

In a way, yeah. I mean, I still think this is one of the more intractable, divisive issues facing the country. Many public officials prefer to attack their opponents over it, rather than actually solve it. But moving beyond just the politics, moving beyond just today, look, you’re right, there’s increasing support for border security measures in this country when you look at both parties.

And when you have the two leaders of each respective party that are both emphasizing that they are the right ones to implement those border security measures, it’s safe to assume that there’s increasing momentum for major changes, to the way that our country welcomes asylum seekers at the border.

Zolan, thank you.

Here’s what else you should know today. A federal court blocked a Texas law that would allow state and local police officers to arrest migrants crossing in from Mexico without authorization. The law had been set to take effect on March 5.

The ruling was a victory for the Biden administration, which had argued that the law would violate federal statutes and the Constitution, which gives authority over immigration matters to the federal government. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has aggressively worked to create a state-level system of border enforcement. He said he would appeal the decision immediately. And —

[CROWD CLAMORING]

— a convoy of trucks carrying food aid into Gaza City was overrun by thousands of desperate Gazans in the early hours of Thursday morning, prompting chaos and a response from nearby Israeli soldiers that left more than 100 people dead and another 700 wounded. The details of what happened were still unclear as of Thursday night.

Gazan authorities blamed the Israeli soldiers, saying that the deaths were caused by gunshot wounds Israeli officials countered, saying that the majority of those who had died had been killed in a stampede several hundred yards away. Gazans in the north of the territory have become increasingly desperate for food, as the United Nations and other relief groups have been largely unable to bring supplies due to impassable roads, risk from military operations, and increasingly, lawlessness and breakdown of social order after nearly five months of war.

Today’s episode was produced by Shannon Lin and Clare Toeniskoetter with help from Sydney Harper and Kate LoPresti. It was edited by Paige Cowett and Michael Benoist with help from Brendan Klinkenberg, contains original music by Marion Lozano, and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly.

“The Daily” is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Christopher Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, MJ Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Michael Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schroeppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jodi Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Dan Farrell, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devin Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez, and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Special thanks to Lisa Tobin, Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Renan Borelli, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson, and Nina Lassam. That’s it for “The Daily.” I’m Sabrina Tavernise. See you on Monday.

The Daily logo

  • March 4, 2024   •   26:06 An F.B.I. Informant, a Bombshell Claim, and an Impeachment Built on a Lie
  • March 3, 2024 The Sunday Read: ‘How Tom Sandoval Became the Most Hated Man in America’
  • March 1, 2024   •   32:33 Biden, Trump and a Split Screen at the Texas Border
  • February 29, 2024   •   26:03 How Poisoned Applesauce Found Its Way to Kids
  • February 28, 2024   •   24:54 An Arms Race Quietly Unfolds in Space
  • February 27, 2024   •   35:04 The Voters Willing to Abandon Biden Over Gaza
  • February 26, 2024   •   29:09 The Alabama Ruling That Could Stop Families From Having Kids
  • February 25, 2024 The Sunday Read: ‘How Do You Make a Weed Empire? Sell It Like Streetwear.’
  • February 23, 2024   •   25:48 Trump’s Cash Crunch
  • February 22, 2024   •   32:02 Putin’s Opposition Ponders a Future Without Aleksei Navalny
  • February 21, 2024   •   23:33 What Happens if America Turns Its Back on Its Allies in Europe
  • February 20, 2024   •   40:44 Stranded in Rafah as an Israeli Invasion Looms
  • Share full article

Hosted by Sabrina Tavernise

Featuring Zolan Kanno-Youngs

Produced by Shannon Lin and Clare Toeniskoetter

With Sydney Harper and Kate LoPresti

Edited by Paige Cowett ,  Michael Benoist and Brendan Klinkenberg

Original music by Dan Powell ,  Elisheba Ittoop and Marion Lozano

Engineered by Alyssa Moxley

Listen and follow The Daily Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music

President Biden and Donald J. Trump both made appearances at the southern border on Thursday as they addressed an issue that is shaping up to be one of the most important in the 2024 election: immigration.

Zolan Kanno-Youngs, a White House correspondent for The Times, discusses Mr. Biden’s risky bid to take perhaps Trump’s biggest rallying point and use it against him.

On today’s episode

journey look into the future live

Zolan Kanno-Youngs , a White House correspondent for The New York Times.

In a split screen, Joe Biden and Donald Trump are both seen speaking behind podiums, with uniformed people on their sides.

Background reading

In appearances some 300 miles apart, Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump tried to leverage a volatile policy dispute of the 2024 campaign.

How visiting the border has become a potent form of political theater .

There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily. Here’s how.

We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.

The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Mike Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Dan Farrell, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Renan Borelli, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson and Nina Lassam.

Zolan Kanno-Youngs is a White House correspondent, covering President Biden and his administration. More about Zolan Kanno-Youngs

Advertisement

IMAGES

  1. Journey

    journey look into the future live

  2. Album Cover of the Week: Journey, Look into the Future

    journey look into the future live

  3. Look Into the Future

    journey look into the future live

  4. Look Into the Future (Live)

    journey look into the future live

  5. Journey

    journey look into the future live

  6. Classic Rock Covers Database (full album download): Journey

    journey look into the future live

VIDEO

  1. Faithfully

COMMENTS

  1. Look into the Future

    Provided to YouTube by ColumbiaLook into the Future · JourneyLook Into The Future℗ 1976 CBS Records Inc.Released on: 1976-01-01Composer, Lyricist: Neal Schon...

  2. JOURNEY

    Rare high quality live version of "Look Into The Future" by Journey where Steve Perry joins Gregg Rolie on vocals for the chorus. Recorded live in Chicago, I...

  3. Journey

    About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ...

  4. Look into the Future

    Look into the Future is the second studio album by Journey.It was released in January 1976 by Columbia Records.. For their second album, the members of Journey toned down the overt progressiveness of their first, self-titled release, in favor of a more focused approach. Despite that, Look into the Future still retains some of the experimental approach and sound of the debut, especially in the ...

  5. How Journey Tried to Shake Things Up on 'Look Into the Future'

    They just lifted it." Journey tried shaking things up again on 1977's Next, toughening up their sound and even handing the microphone to Schon for two songs. But when that project halted at No. 85 ...

  6. Journey

    Listen to Look into the Future (Live) by Journey on Deezer. Mystery Mountain, In My Lonely Feeling, Look into the Future...

  7. Look Into the Future (Live)

    OVERVIEW. LYRICS. Music Video. JOURNEY - "Look Into The Future", w/ Steve Perry LIVE & RARE 1978 (High Quality)!

  8. Look into the Future (Live)

    Journey. Listen to Look into the Future (Live) on Spotify. Journey · Song · 2012. ...

  9. Journey

    View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 2019 Vinyl release of "Live Into The Future 1976" on Discogs.

  10. Live into the Future (Live)

    Listen to Live into the Future (Live) on Spotify. Journey · Compilation · 2012 · 9 songs.

  11. Journey

    Look into the Future is the second studio album by Journey. It was released in January 1976 on Columbia Records. For their second album, the members of Journey toned down the overt progressiveness ...

  12. Look into the Future

    Look into the Future by Journey released in 1976. Find album reviews, track lists, credits, awards and more at AllMusic. ... Look into the Future (1976) Next (1977) Infinity (1978) Evolution (1979) Departure (1980 ... Trial by Fire (1996) Arrival (2001) Generations (2005) Revelation (2008) Live in Manila (2010) Eclipse (2011) Freedom (2022 ...

  13. Journey

    If your ears haven't yet been blessed by the Journey that was pre-Steve Perry, it's worth the listen! Journey's 1976 "Look into the Future" features the lead vocals of Gregg Rolie, a founding member of both Journey and Santana (having been inducted into the R&R hall of fame as a member of both), as well as drummer Aynsley Dunbar, famous for his inclusion on the records of Frank Zappa, Jeff ...

  14. ‎Look Into the Future

    Listen to Look Into the Future by Journey on Apple Music. 1976. 8 Songs. Duration: 41 minutes. Listen to Look Into the Future by Journey on Apple Music. 1976. 8 Songs. Duration: 41 minutes. ... Greatest Hits Live. 1998. Evolution. 1979. Greatest Hits 2. 2011. Featured On. Journey: Deep Cuts. Apple Music Classic Rock. You Might Also Like Gamma 2 ...

  15. Look Into The Future

    Look into the Future is the second studio album by Journey. It was released in January 1976 by Columbia Records. For their second album, the members of Journey toned down the overt progressiveness of their first, self-titled release, in favor of a more focused approach. Despite that, Look into the Future still retains some of the experimental approach and sound of the debut, especially in the ...

  16. Look Into The Future (Live)

    0:00 / 0:00. Provided to YouTube by IIP-DDS Look Into The Future (Live) · Journey You're On Your Own ℗ 2012 Black Barn Music Released on: 2023-04-02 Music Publisher...

  17. Journey

    View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 2012 CD release of "Live Into The Future" on Discogs.

  18. Journey

    Artist: Journey Title: Look into the futureYear: 1976

  19. The Meaning Behind The Song: Look into the Future by Journey

    The lyrics for Look into the Future were written by Journey's keyboardist, Gregg Rolie. He has a knack for capturing complex emotions and weaving them into unforgettable lyrics. 3. How did Look into the Future impact Journey's career? Look into the Future marked a significant milestone for the band, solidifying their place in the rock music ...

  20. Live Into The Future

    Live Into The Future is a live album released in 2012. Mystery Mountain (Live) In My Lonely Feeling (Live) Look Into The Future (Live) On A Saturday Nite (Live) Midnight Dreamer (Live) Of A Lifetime (Live) You're On Your Own (Live) It's All Too Much (Live) In The Morning Day (Live)

  21. Police called to Willy Wonka event after refunds demanded

    The event was cancelled half way through its first day due to complaints. Police were called to an event described as a "Willy Wonka Experience" in Glasgow as angry families demanded refunds.

  22. New anaconda species said to be largest ever found in the Amazon

    The journey into the jungle. Chief Baihua led Fry's team on a 10-day search for the anacondas, which are considered sacred to the tribe. ... "Our future expeditions will focus on the collection ...

  23. An Arms Race Quietly Unfolds in Space

    The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan ...

  24. Aynsley Dunbar

    The rock drumming GIANT turned down both Jimmy Page's offer to form Led Zeppelin and Robert Fripp's to start King Crimson from out of the ashes of Giles, Gil...

  25. Japan's population crisis was years in the making

    It fell below that level after the 1973 global oil crisis pushed economies into recession, and never climbed back up. As of last year, Japan's fertility rate sat at 1.3.

  26. Politics latest: Speculation mounts over pre-election budget; Labour to

    The pre-election budget will be delivered on Wednesday, with the Conservatives hoping to shift the dial as they languish in the polls. Listen to this week's Politics at Jack and Sam's podcast as ...

  27. An F.B.I. Informant, a Bombshell Claim, and an Impeachment Built on a

    Fact-checking by Susan Lee.. The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood ...

  28. Biden, Trump and a Split Screen at the Texas Border

    The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan ...

  29. Journey

    "Look Into The Future" is the second studio album by Journey. It was released on January 1, 1976.Gregg Rolie - keyboards, lead vocalsNeal Schon - guitarRoss ...

  30. Journey

    Share your videos with friends, family, and the world